Real Estate and Private Fund Fraud Recoveries: 5 of 11 Cases Show No Payment, 3 Paid 22% to 107% (Nov 2026)
Some links pay us a referral fee; each one says so. Disclosure
Quick Answer
As of November 10, 2026: in the 11 real estate and private-fund fraud and failure cases we have read in primary documents, 5 show no payment to investors (Drive Planning, First Liberty Building & Loan, Wells Real Estate Investment, SQN Capital Management's funds and iCap), 3 have paid between 22% and 107% of their claim base, and 3 have paid on other measures. The three high payers are EquiAlt (the receiver says he has distributed 107% of approved claim amounts, in three payments from October 2023), Woodbridge ($37.04 per Class A Interest against a $75.00 face target, 49.4%, our arithmetic) and NRIA (22% of Net Investor Claim Amount, paid in December 2024 and August 2025). The other three are GWG (about 3.7 cents per trust interest in July 2026), United Development Funding IV (12.27% of eligible losses from an SEC Fair Fund) and GPB Capital (about $400 million paid in April 2025). The percentages use different bases and cannot be ranked against each other without the conversions below.
Key Takeaways
- Time to a first payment ran from 1.3 years (Woodbridge, from the December 4, 2017 Chapter 11 filing to the March 15, 2019 distribution) to 5.2 years (United Development Funding, from the July 3, 2018 SEC complaint to the September 8, 2023 Fair Fund payout list), our arithmetic. Three cases are past two years with nothing paid (Drive Planning, Wells, iCap).
- The three cases that paid most all held or had held large amounts of real property: Woodbridge carried $582.71 million of net real estate assets in $621.34 million of total assets at its plan effective date, and its cash paid out plus remaining net assets is about 120% of the $383.49 million net assets it started with (our arithmetic). Cases where the documents describe the money as lent on, diverted or held in shares that lost value (United Development Funding, iCap, GWG) show 12.27%, 3.7% or no payment.
- Net-loss claim bases hide how much already came back. Drive Planning investors had received about $160 million of $380 million before the receivership (42.1%, our arithmetic) and First Liberty investors about $89 million of $155 million (57.4%). A 26.2% distribution on Drive Planning's $229 million of losses is about 15.8% of deposits (our arithmetic).
- Clawbacks from investors who took out more than they put in are a fairness tool more than a source of cash so far: Drive Planning's receiver has collected $1,838,360.07 from net winners, about 0.8% of $229 million in losses (our arithmetic). EquiAlt's receiver lists 34 outstanding investor judgments totaling $732,517.
- Cash sitting with a receiver is not a recovery rate. Drive Planning's receiver held $84,776,399.72 on September 30, 2026 (37.0% of investor losses, our arithmetic) and had paid nothing; First Liberty's held $4,831,779.41 (7.3% of $66 million in losses) and had paid nothing.
- n is 11, only 5 cases share a claim-based percentage, and each case is different. Read the comparisons as patterns in documents, not as a forecast for any other case.
CSV · 112 rows
Real estate fraud cases compared: what investors got back, 11 cases, 2017-2026
112 rows, one per case per metric, from SEC releases, receiver reports, court orders, trust filings and a state order. Source and document id on every row.
What this page is
Every page about a failed real estate investment answers one case. This page lines up eleven of them, so that someone whose money is in one of them can see what the others have actually paid, how long the first payment took and what the court papers say drove the difference. Each row comes from a primary document: an SEC litigation release, a receiver's report, a court order, a bankruptcy trust's report or a Form 10-K. The figures were re-read in those documents on November 10, 2026.
Everything an SEC release or complaint says about how an offering worked is an allegation. What is a fact is the document record: what was filed, what a court approved and what a receiver or trust reports it paid. We do not name private individuals, and we say what each document calls the case rather than choosing a label ourselves. This is analysis of public documents, not investment, legal or tax advice.
The 11 cases side by side
The table runs from the most paid to the least, then the cases with no payment. “Years” count from the day the case started in court (SEC complaint or Chapter 11 petition) to the first distribution; where nothing has been paid we show the years elapsed to November 10, 2026. Each case has its own page: follow the links in the notes below the table.
| Case | What the document calls it | Raised and investors | Structure | Years to first payment | Paid so far, on the document's own basis | Latest dated document |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EquiAlt | “Ponzi-like payments” between two funds (SEC LR-24740) | More than $170 million, at least 1,100 investors (SEC allegation) | SEC receivership, M.D. Fla. 8:20-cv-325 | 3.7 (Feb 14, 2020 to Oct 11, 2023) | 107% of approved claim amounts (receiver); $160 million in three distributions | 27th report, Doc. 1436, Oct 30, 2026 |
| Woodbridge Liquidation Trust | a large-scale “Ponzi” scheme (trust Form 10-K) | More than $1.22 billion, over 10,000 investors (10-K) | Chapter 11 liquidation trust | 1.3 (Dec 4, 2017 to Mar 15, 2019) | $37.04 per Class A Interest on a $75.00 face target = 49.4% (our arithmetic); 11 distributions, last on May 10, 2023 | 10-K, fiscal year ended Jun 30, 2026 (0001140361-26-037688) |
| NRIA (AIRN Liquidation Trust) | “Ponzi-like scheme” (SEC LR-25558) | About $600 million, about 2,000 investors (SEC allegation) | Chapter 11 liquidation trust, D.N.J. 22-14539 | 2.5 (Jun 7, 2022 to Dec 2024) | 22% of Net Investor Claim Amount to contributing investors: 10% in Dec 2024 plus 12% in Aug 2025 (our sum) | Trust report notes, Doc 4280, Feb 25, 2026 |
| United Development Funding IV | None: SEC says investors were misled and newer-fund money paid older-fund distributions (LR-24185) | About $614.7 million raised in its primary offering (10-K) | SEC case plus class action, no receiver; Fair Fund | 5.2 to the Fair Fund payout list (Sep 8, 2023); the class settlement came 0.6 years after the complaint | 12.27% of eligible losses ($8,275,062.06 to 19,781 investors) plus a $10,435,725 class fund | SEC motion to disburse, Doc. 33, Sep 8, 2023 |
| GWG Holdings | None for the company in the trust documents we read | About $1.3 billion of L Bonds outstanding in 2021; about 26,000 holders now | Chapter 11 and Wind Down Trust | 4.2 (Apr 20, 2022 to Jul 14, 2026) | About 3.7 cents per trust interest ($60 million) in July 2026; the trust estimates 3.913% in total from approved settlements | Joint status report, Doc 2951, Aug 20, 2026 |
| GPB Capital | “fraudulent securities scheme” (SEC complaint, as described by the receiver) | More than $1.7 billion, about 17,000 investors (SEC allegation) | SEC receivership, E.D.N.Y. 1:21-cv-00583 | 4.2 from the SEC complaint (Feb 4, 2021 to Apr 25, 2025); 0.4 from the receivership taking effect | About $400 million paid in one distribution to investors in three funds; no per-dollar rate stated | Receiver report, Doc 350, Apr 20, 2026 |
| Drive Planning | “real estate Ponzi scheme” (SEC LR-26076); “operated as a Ponzi scheme” (receiver) | More than $300 million, more than 2,000 investors (SEC); receiver counts about 2,800 investors and more than $380 million deposited | SEC receivership, N.D. Ga. 1:24-cv-03583 | None yet (2.2 elapsed) | Nothing paid. Court approved the plan on Aug 13, 2026; first distribution proposed at about $65 million; pro rata alternative would be about 26.2% | Receiver 9th report, ECF 481, Oct 30, 2026 |
| First Liberty Building & Loan | “a Ponzi scheme” (SEC LR-26358) | At least $140 million, about 300 investors (SEC); receiver counts about 200 investors, more than $155 million | SEC receivership, N.D. Ga. 1:25-cv-03826 | None yet (1.3 elapsed) | Nothing paid; claims bar date Dec 26, 2026 | Receiver 5th report, ECF 141, Oct 30, 2026 |
| Wells Real Estate Investment | “Ponzi scheme” (alleged; SEC LR-26571) | At least $56 million, approximately 660 investors (SEC allegation) | SEC receivership, S.D. Fla. 9:24-cv-80980 | None yet (2.25 elapsed) | Nothing paid; no claims process open yet; distributions indefinitely suspended | Receiver 8th report, ECF 219, Jul 30, 2026 |
| iCap | Bankruptcy court found it “operated a Ponzi scheme” (as recited in a Washington state order) | At least $230 million, more than 1,800 investors (court finding) | Chapter 11 and iCap Trust, Bankr. E.D. Wash. | None found (3.1 elapsed) | No payment, date or amount in any document we could read | Washington DFI order S-23-3608-26-FO02, Apr 24, 2026 |
| SQN Capital Management funds | None: breach of fiduciary duty and inflated net asset values (SEC LR-26671) | $102.8 million in the two largest funds (their last 10-Ks, our sum) | SEC consent receivership, S.D.N.Y. 1:26-cv-08162 | None yet (0.15 elapsed) | Nothing paid; receiver appointed Oct 8, 2026 | SEC LR-26671, Oct 9, 2026 |
Case pages: EquiAlt, Woodbridge, NRIA, United Development Funding, GWG Holdings, GPB Capital, Drive Planning, First Liberty Building & Loan, Wells Real Estate Investment, iCap and SQN Capital Management.
Two of the eleven are not frauds in the court documents. The SEC's release on SQN alleges that the manager breached its duties and kept net asset values unchanged for years, and does not use the word Ponzi. United Development Funding's release says investors were misled about where distribution money came from. We include them because an investor in either holds the same kind of stuck claim and the recovery routes are comparable.
Four bases, and why one number does not compare to another
A percentage means nothing until you know what it is a percentage of. In these cases there are four different denominators, and the documents do not always say which one they use.
| Basis | Cases that use it | What is left out | How to read it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percent of approved or allowed claims (net loss: money in minus money out) | EquiAlt (107%), NRIA (22%), Drive Planning (26.2% pro rata alternative) | Anything investors received before the collapse; promised but unpaid interest | A high percentage can still be a small share of what you originally put in |
| Dollars per unit against a face amount | Woodbridge ($37.04 per Class A Interest; one interest per $75.00 of net note claim) | The 105% enhancement for contributing claims and the Class 5 coefficient | We divide $37.04 by $75.00: 49.4%, our arithmetic, and label it |
| Percent of eligible loss | United Development Funding (12.27%, SEC Fair Fund) | Class-action money paid separately | A separate pool with its own formula |
| Dollars paid, no rate stated | GPB Capital ($400 million), GWG (about 3.7 cents per interest) | The base the rate would apply to | GPB paid $400 million against $1.7 billion alleged raised (23.5%, our arithmetic), but only three partnerships were paid, so we do not rank it |
We never turn a percent of allowed claims into a percent of principal without saying so. The two cases where the receiver publishes the pre-collapse payments let us do it exactly.
How much came back before the collapse (our arithmetic)
An allowed claim in a Ponzi-type receivership is usually net loss: what you sent in, minus what you were paid out, whatever the paper called it. So the first number you meet is already net of what came back.
| Case | Deposited or transferred in | Paid back before the receivership | Net loss (claim base) | Back before, as share of deposits | Net loss, as share of deposits |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drive Planning (ECF 451, Aug 11, 2026) | More than $380,000,000 | About $160,000,000 | About $229,000,000 | 42.1% | 60.3% |
| First Liberty (ECF 117, Aug 6, 2026) | More than $155,000,000 | About $89,000,000 | At least $66,000,000 | 57.4% | 42.6% |
A worked example for Drive Planning: the receiver says a straight pro rata distribution of the $60 million first tranche would pay every claimant about 26.2% of their allowed claim. Applied to the $229 million of losses, that is about $60 million, or 15.8% of the $380 million deposited. Add the $160 million investors had received earlier and the total is $220 million, or 57.9% of deposits (our arithmetic, using “more than” and “approximately” figures from the receiver). The receiver's court-approved plan does not pay pro rata: it uses a Rising Tide method that gives more to investors who had recovered less, and the receiver says about 67.3% of claimants do better under it than under pro rata.
What went with higher recoveries (our arithmetic, n is small)
Look at what each estate actually held, where its recovery came from and where it ended up. This is pattern-spotting across eleven documents, not a model.
| Feature | Evidence in the documents | Cases it points to |
|---|---|---|
| Real property actually owned | Woodbridge's net real estate assets were $582.71 million of $621.34 million of total assets at its plan effective date (93.8%, our arithmetic); the trust says it has liquidated all but one real estate asset. EquiAlt's receiver has held at least 23 auctions. NRIA's plan proponents estimated $168.3 million for 17 remaining properties in May 2023. | The three highest percentages (EquiAlt, Woodbridge, NRIA) |
| Money lent to affiliates, spent or held as financial assets | iCap's Vault fund deployed $16.4 million of about $206 million to real estate (8.1%, per the state order); in November 2022 its total assets were $93 million against $230 million of debt. GPB's funds owned operating businesses rather than real estate (receiver report, Doc 350). GWG's trust held shares of an affiliate whose price “has dropped significantly since the Confirmation Date”, and its 3.913% estimate comes from approved settlements. | GWG 3.7%, iCap no payment, GPB paid but with no per-dollar rate |
| Settlements with banks, law firms and professionals | Woodbridge's cash settlements from avoidance actions total about $22.89 million, 5.3% of the $433.16 million it has declared (our arithmetic); a Comerica Bank settlement fed its ninth distribution. EquiAlt's receiver proposed a $44 million settlement with a former attorney and two law firms in January 2023. GWG's trust estimates 3.913% from all approved settlements. | Central to GWG's estimate; a $44 million settlement proposed at EquiAlt; about 5% at Woodbridge |
| Clawbacks of investors who took out more than they put in | Drive Planning has agreed $2,334,451.38 and collected $1,838,360.07 from net winners (0.8% of losses, our arithmetic). EquiAlt reports 34 outstanding investor judgments of $732,517. | Small in every case so far |
| Speed of the court process | The two bankruptcy trusts paid first soonest (Woodbridge 1.3 years, NRIA 2.5). SEC receiverships ran 3.7 years (EquiAlt) or have nothing paid after 2.2 years (Drive Planning, Wells). The Chapter 11 case with the least paid (iCap) had its plan confirmed in about 13 months and still shows no payment after 3.1 years. | Mixed: a plan alone does not pay investors |
Three observations, each with the caveat that eleven cases cannot prove a cause.
- Property you can sell beats cash that was diverted. The cases where the estate held real property that could be auctioned or sold paid the largest share of claims. The cases where the document says the money went to affiliates or into other things sit at the bottom.
- Clawbacks and third-party suits take years and add a few points. Woodbridge's avoidance settlements are about 5% of what it has declared. At GWG the trust's estimate from approved settlements is about 3.9% of bond claims.
- One trust has beaten its own opening estimate. Woodbridge estimated $383.49 million of net assets in liquidation at its plan effective date; it has since distributed or declared about $426.20 million and still holds $35.86 million of net assets, about 120% of the first estimate in total (our arithmetic). Settlements with banks and law firms are part of why. With one trust we cannot say the same holds elsewhere.
What the process looks like
The steps are similar across receiverships and trusts. Here they are with a dated example from the case documents for each.
| Step | What happens | Example from the documents |
|---|---|---|
| Claims process approved | The court orders a claims process and a claims agent mails packages with each investor's money in and out | First Liberty: order approving the claims process entered October 27, 2026; packages by November 6, 2026 (receiver's 5th report) |
| Claims bar date | The deadline to submit or dispute a claim. Late claims are normally not allowed without good cause | First Liberty: December 26, 2026, day 60 of the schedule |
| Claims determination | The receiver or trustee rules on each claim and sets an allowed amount | Drive Planning: final determination date January 22, 2026; EquiAlt: determination motion granted July 26, 2023 (Doc. 781) |
| Objections and appeals | A claimant can appeal; a trustee can object to claims that were settled or disputed | Drive Planning: seven claimants appealed, all resolved before the August 2026 plan. NRIA: order of October 21, 2024 sustaining the trustee's first omnibus objection to claims by contributing investors |
| Plan of distribution and interim distributions | The court approves a method and a first payment; further payments follow as money comes in | EquiAlt: $100 million approved October 11, 2023. Woodbridge: eleven distributions between March 15, 2019 and May 10, 2023. Drive Planning: hybrid Rising Tide plan approved August 13, 2026 |
| Net-winner clawbacks | The estate sues or settles with investors who received more than they invested, and with agents and third parties | Drive Planning: net-winner settlements of $2,334,451.38 agreed, $1,838,360.07 collected (September 30, 2026) |
| Final distribution and closing | The last payment, then the trust or receivership ends, sometimes years after the first | EquiAlt's receiver says there will be an additional distribution; Woodbridge expects to complete its liquidation by February 15, 2028 |
What a reader can do with this
This page cannot tell you what you will recover, and we do not recommend any lawyer or service. The documents suggest a few things worth checking.
- Find which basis your case uses. Look for the words “allowed claim”, “net loss”, “Class A Interest” or “eligible loss” in your receiver's or trust's latest report. That tells you which row of the basis table your number belongs to.
- Do the deposit arithmetic for yourself. Take what you sent in, subtract what you were paid before the collapse, and compare it with the allowed claim you were sent. The difference is the money that came back before the receiver started.
- Mark the deadlines on the receiver's page. The claims bar date is the one date that can end a claim. In First Liberty it is December 26, 2026. Receiver sites post every order and notice.
- Read the cash line separately from the distribution line. A receiver can hold millions in cash and still have paid investors nothing. The fund-accounting table in each report shows both.
- Keep the tax paperwork. Distributions on top of principal, as in EquiAlt's third distribution, can be treated differently from a return of principal. That is a question for a tax adviser.
What is not known
- Whether Drive Planning's first distribution will be paid at the proposed $65 million; the receiver says a review of about 883 claims could take about 90 days.
- Whether First Liberty, Wells or SQN will pay on a timetable similar to the early cases here: none of their receivers gives a date.
- What iCap's trust has recovered from its adversary suits: no amount appears in the documents we could read.
- The size of GPB's second distribution and GWG's later ones: both are tied to settlements and cases still pending.
- Anything about a case not on this list. These eleven are the cases we have read in primary documents, not a census.
FAQ
Update alert · free
An email when the real estate fraud receiverships numbers change
When a rate, rule or filing behind this page changes: what changed, the one number that matters, and the source to check it yourself.
Sources, all read on November 10, 2026: SEC Litigation Releases LR-24740 (EquiAlt), LR-25558 (NRIA), LR-24185 (United Development Funding), LR-26076 (Drive Planning), LR-26358 (First Liberty), LR-26571 (Wells Real Estate Investment) and LR-26671 (SQN Capital Management); EquiAlt receiver's motion for a third distribution (Doc. 1326, May 23, 2025), 12th, 18th and 27th quarterly reports (Doc. 1436, October 30, 2026); Drive Planning receiver's motion (ECF 451, August 11, 2026), the order approving the plan (ECF 455, August 13, 2026), the Rising Tide calculation and the 9th report (ECF 481, October 30, 2026); First Liberty receiver's claims motion (ECF 117, August 6, 2026) and 5th report (ECF 141, October 30, 2026); Wells receiver's 8th report (ECF 219, July 30, 2026) and initial investor letter; NRIA's Disclosure Statement (Doc 2559), the order at Doc 4033 and trust notes at Doc 4280 (February 25, 2026); Washington DFI order S-23-3608-26-FO02 and the iCap Trust release of December 5, 2024; Woodbridge Liquidation Trust Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2026 (0001140361-26-037688); GPB receiver's report (Doc 350, filed with 8-K 0001104659-26-056317) and GPB Holdings II's Form 10-Q for the first quarter of 2025 (0001410578-25-001367); GWG joint status report (Doc 2951, August 20, 2026), the trust's website and financial statements and GWG Holdings' Form 10-Q for September 30, 2021; United Development Funding's SEC motion to disburse (Doc. 33, September 8, 2023), the class-settlement order (Doc. 86, February 21, 2019) and UDF IV's 2014 Form 10-K; SQN AIF III and IV Forms 10-K for 2018. The SQN complaint and receiver order are scanned images that did not convert to text, so we used the SEC release for that case. This is analysis of public documents, not investment, legal or tax advice.
Keep reading.
- 0122 min read
American Equity Annuities After Brookfield: $96.1 Billion of Policyholder Balances at June 30, 2026
American Equity's parent now files as American National Group Inc. (CIK 1039828). Its latest 10-Q: $96.1B of policyholder balances, reinsurers, Brookfield fees.
- 0222 min read
Athene Annuity Q3 2026 10-Q: $298.1B Net Reserves, 61% Private Credit, Bermuda Reinsurance
Athene's 10-Q of November 5, 2026: $298.1B net reserves, private credit 61% of assets by its definition, 15.1% Apollo-linked, A+ ratings, Bermuda quota shares.
- 0317 min read
Brighthouse Annuity Holders: Aquarian Deal Not Closed at Nov 5, 2026, With Dec 6, 2026 Outside Date
Brighthouse Financial's sale to Aquarian had not closed in its Nov 5, 2026 10-Q: three insurance regulators pending, outside date Dec 6, 2026. What annuity holders can read.