ARV Calculator: Comps, Adjustments and Lender Loan-to-ARV Caps
Some links pay us a referral fee; each one says so. Disclosure
Quick Answer
As of October 27, 2026: after repair value (ARV) is the median of your comparable sales after you adjust each one to look like the finished house, and the lender then caps its loan at a share of that value: 80% at Kiavi, 75% at Lima One Capital and 75% at RCN Capital for experienced flippers, falling to 70%, 65% or 60% at RCN for newer investors or heavy rehabs. On the worked example below (a $215,000 purchase, a $45,000 rehab and five comps, all ours), the adjusted comps run from $316,708 to $345,248 with a median of $331,200. At that median a $238,500 loan fits under every cap except RCN Capital's new-investor 70% ($231,840) and its heavy-rehab tiers; if the lender's ARV comes in 5% lower, at $314,640, Lima One's and RCN's 75% caps bind too (our arithmetic). Fannie Mae's Selling Guide, the public benchmark for how an appraiser adjusts, sets no limit on net or gross adjustments, and federal HMDA data has no ARV field: the 47,900 short-term investor purchase loans of 2025 report a median loan-to-value of 70.62%, measured against “the value of the property relied on”.
Key Takeaways
- Lender caps read October 27, 2026: Kiavi “Up to 80% of after-repair value” (headline up to 100% LTC); Lima One Capital “Up to 95% LTC & 75% LTV” (the page does not say LTV means ARV); RCN Capital up to 100% of purchase plus 100% of renovation, “Not to Exceed 75% of the ARV”, with a grid that runs from 75% down to 60% by experience and rehab size.
- RCN Capital's page shows two sets of caps for borrowers with a few flips: the headline tier for up to 2 flips says 70% of ARV, the grid for 1 to 4 flips says 75%, 72.5% or 65% by rehab size. Ask which applies to you in writing.
- Worked example (our arithmetic): five adjusted comps give $316,708, $327,724, $331,200, $339,315 and $345,248. The median is $331,200, and one comp with a 15.2% gross adjustment (E) is the weakest. Dropping it moves the middle to $335,258.
- The ARV that makes a $238,500 loan fit is $298,125 at an 80% cap, $318,000 at 75%, $328,966 at 72.5%, $340,715 at 70% and $397,500 at 60% (our arithmetic). An ARV only 4.0% below the example median ($331,200 to $318,000) makes a 75% cap bind.
- Each $10,000 of ARV moves the 70% rule max offer by $7,000 and a 75% loan cap by $7,500 (our arithmetic). On the example the rule gives $186,840 at the median ARV and $176,696 at the lowest adjusted comp, against a $215,000 contract.
- Fannie Mae's Selling Guide B4-1.3-09 (dated June 4, 2025) “does not have specific limitations or guidelines associated with net or gross adjustments”, and requires at least three closed comparables (B4-1.3-08). Any “keep adjustments under X%” rule belongs to a lender or to you, not to Fannie Mae.
- Federal HMDA data for 2025 shows a median reported loan-to-value of 70.62% on 47,900 short-term investor purchase loans (42,448 report the ratio), 70.13% at non-banks and 75% at banks and credit unions. It cannot tell you the ARV the lender used.
CSV · 162 rows
ARV calculator: lender loan-to-ARV caps, Fannie Mae adjustment rules, HMDA loan-to-value and a worked example
Loan-to-ARV and loan-to-cost limits from Kiavi, Lima One, RCN Capital and LendingOne pages read October 27, 2026, Fannie Mae comparable-sales and adjustment rules, HMDA 2025 loan-to-value for short-term investor purchase loans, and the worked example with loan and 70% rule scenarios. One source per row.
The worksheet: five comps, five adjustments, one range
An ARV is not a single lookup. It is a range built from sold comparables, each adjusted for what makes it different from your finished house. The layout below is what you fill in. The inputs are yours; the adjustment rates must come from your market (see the Fannie Mae section below), so we show our placeholders only to demonstrate the arithmetic.
Worksheet layout: one column per comp, one row per adjustment
| Line | What you enter | Sign rule |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Sale price | Closed price of the comp, with the closing date and distance | Starting point |
| 2. Time adjustment | Sale price x monthly market change x months since the sale (or the change in a price index) | Plus if prices rose since the sale |
| 3. Above-grade area | (Your finished area minus comp area) x dollars per square foot | Plus if the comp is smaller than your finished house |
| 4. Bedrooms | (Your bedrooms minus comp bedrooms) x dollars per bedroom | Plus if the comp has fewer |
| 5. Bathrooms | (Your baths minus comp baths) x dollars per bath | Plus if the comp has fewer |
| 6. Condition and finish | Dollar difference between the comp's condition and your finished level | Plus if the comp is dated or unrenovated |
| 7. Net adjustment | Sum of lines 2 to 6, with signs | Plus or minus |
| 8. Gross adjustment | Sum of lines 2 to 6 as positive numbers; divide by line 1 for a percent | Always positive |
| 9. Adjusted price | Line 1 plus line 7 | One value per comp |
| 10. ARV | Median of line 9 across comps, then the low and high of the range | Use the range, not one number |
Add lines for lot size, garage, basement and anything else that moves price in your market. Keep each comp to the same row structure so the adjustments can be compared. The sign rule is simply that you adjust the comp toward your subject: a smaller comp is adjusted up, a larger one down.
Worked example: a $215,000 flip with five comps (our arithmetic)
The subject is a house we chose: 1,400 square feet above grade, 3 bedrooms and 2 baths after rehab, bought for $215,000 with a $45,000 rehab budget (the same deal as in our fix and flip calculator). The five comps and the adjustment rates are invented for the example. The rates are placeholders: $85 per square foot, $5,000 per bedroom, $4,000 per bath, $40,000 between a dated and a renovated house, and 0.3% of sale price per month for time. They are not market data.
The five comps (example data)
| Comp | Sale price | Above-grade area | Bed / bath | Months since sale | Condition |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | $325,000 | 1,350 sq ft | 3 / 2 | 2 | Renovated |
| B | $341,000 | 1,480 sq ft | 3 / 2 | 5 | Renovated |
| C | $309,000 | 1,400 sq ft | 3 / 1 | 4 | Renovated |
| D | $352,000 | 1,520 sq ft | 4 / 2 | 8 | Renovated |
| E | $286,000 | 1,410 sq ft | 3 / 2 | 3 | Dated |
Adjustments and adjusted prices (our arithmetic)
| Comp | Time | Area | Bedroom | Bath | Condition | Net | Gross % of price | Adjusted price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | +$1,950 | +$4,250 | $0 | $0 | $0 | +$6,200 | 1.9% | $331,200 |
| B | +$5,115 | -$6,800 | $0 | $0 | $0 | -$1,685 | 3.5% | $339,315 |
| C | +$3,708 | $0 | $0 | +$4,000 | $0 | +$7,708 | 2.5% | $316,708 |
| D | +$8,448 | -$10,200 | -$5,000 | $0 | $0 | -$6,752 | 6.7% | $345,248 |
| E | +$2,574 | -$850 | $0 | $0 | +$40,000 | +$41,724 | 15.2% | $327,724 |
For comp A: time is $325,000 x 0.3% x 2 months = $1,950; area is (1,400 - 1,350) x $85 = $4,250; net is $6,200; the adjusted price is $325,000 + $6,200 = $331,200. The range of adjusted prices is $316,708 to $345,248, the median is $331,200 and the mean is $332,039. Comp E needs a $40,000 condition adjustment, which is 15.2% of its price in gross terms; the others are 6.7% or less. If you set E aside as a weak comp (our screen, not a rule of any lender), the middle of the four remaining is $335,258, the average of $331,200 and $339,315. Which of those is your ARV is a judgment: the median of all five is the lowest of the central numbers, and a lender's appraiser who distrusts the renovated comps will start near the low end.
One trap in the worksheet: the condition line is a market adjustment, what buyers pay more for a renovated house, not your rehab cost. In the example it is $40,000 against a $45,000 budget; if you used the budget itself, you would be assuming that every renovation dollar returns a dollar of price.
What Fannie Mae says about comps and adjustments
Fannie Mae's Selling Guide is not a hard money rulebook: it governs loans sold to Fannie Mae, and a bridge lender is not bound by it. It is the public text on how an appraiser should select and adjust comparable sales, so it is the best reference for what a defensible adjustment looks like. We read two sections on October 27, 2026, both carrying the version date June 4, 2025.
Fannie Mae Selling Guide sections B4-1.3-08 and B4-1.3-09 (version dated June 4, 2025)
| Topic | What the text says | What it means for your worksheet |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum comps (B4-1.3-08) | “A minimum of three closed comparables must be reported in the sales comparison approach.” | Use at least three closed sales; five gives you a median |
| Age of comps (B4-1.3-08) | Comparable sales that have closed within the last 12 months “should be used in the appraisal”; an older sale is acceptable if the report explains why | Prefer sales from the last 12 months; time-adjust older ones and say why |
| Size of adjustments (B4-1.3-09) | Fannie Mae “does not have specific limitations or guidelines associated with net or gross adjustments” | Fannie Mae gives no percentage cutoff; a cutoff is a lender or personal screen |
| Adjustments as a test (B4-1.3-09) | The number or amount of the adjustments “must not be the sole determinant in the acceptability of a comparable” | Do not drop a comp only because its gross percent is high |
| Market-based rates (B4-1.3-09) | A $20 per square foot adjustment based on a rule of thumb is inappropriate when market analysis indicates $100 per square foot | Derive each rate from paired sales, not from a rule of thumb |
| Large adjustments (B4-1.3-09) | If adjustments are great enough to indicate the property may not conform to the neighborhood, the underwriter must determine that the opinion of value is adequately supported | A comp that needs a lot of adjustment weakens the support for the value |
| Time adjustments (B4-1.3-09) | “Time adjustments, or the lack thereof, must be supported by evidence”; home price indices are acceptable support | Back the monthly rate with an index or with paired sales |
| Reconciliation (B4-1.3-09) | The indicated value must be “within the range of the adjusted sales price of the comparables” | Your ARV must sit inside the adjusted range, not above it |
The practical reading: a high gross adjustment is a reason to look harder, not a violation, and the reverse is also true. A comp with a 3% gross adjustment built on a made-up rate is worse than a 15% one built on a paired sale. The page's own example, a $20 against $100 per square foot error, is the mistake the worksheet makes easy if you copy a rate from an article.
Where the lender's ARV comes from
Your worksheet sets your ARV. The lender sets its own, and the loan is sized on that. Kiavi's page says its “proven ARV model” helps you “quickly estimate financing for your next fix-and-flip project”, and its list of terms includes “No Appraisal”; the page does not say how the ARV used for the final sizing is set. Lima One's FixNFlip page states a 75% LTV and does not define the value. RCN Capital's page names ARV and states a minimum ARV by property type ($100,000 for a single-family home) without describing how it is determined. LendingOne publishes an ARV calculator that applies the 70% rule. So the dependable approach is to bring a comp set to the lender, ask which value they will use and whether an appraisal or desk review is part of the process, and size your deal on the lower of your range and theirs.
What each lender caps: the published loan-to-ARV limits
We read the fix-and-flip pages of Kiavi, Lima One Capital, RCN Capital and LendingOne on October 27, 2026 (the earlier readings behind our hard money loan calculator and best fix-and-flip lender pages are unchanged on these limits). They are advertised maximums, not quotes.
Published leverage on fix-and-flip pages, read October 27, 2026
| Lender and page | Loan-to-cost | Loan-to-ARV or LTV | Rehab financed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kiavi, kiavi.com/loans/fix-and-flip | “Up to 100% of purchase price” (the text of the page also says up to 95% LTC) | “Up to 80% of after-repair value” | “100% of rehab cost” |
| Lima One Capital, limaone.com/fix-and-flip-loans | “Up to 95% LTC & 75% LTV” | 75% LTV, ARV not named | 100% of rehab budget, with draws |
| RCN Capital, rcncapital.com/fix-and-flip, program headline | Up to 100% of the purchase price + 100% of the renovation cost | “Not to Exceed 75% of the ARV” | 100% of renovation cost |
| RCN Capital, new investor tier (up to 2 flips in 3 years) | Up to 80% of purchase price | 70% of the ARV | Up to 100% |
| RCN Capital, intermediate tier (3 to 5 flips) | Up to 90% of purchase price | 72.5% of the ARV | Up to 100% |
| RCN Capital, experienced tier (more than 10 flips, 720+ FICO) | Up to 95% of purchase price | 75% of the ARV | Up to 100% |
| LendingOne, lendingone.com/fix-and-flip-loans | “up to 92.5% loan-to-cost” | No loan-to-ARV cap on the page we saved | 100% of rehab costs |
RCN Capital's page also carries a grid by experience and rehab size, and it is the clearest public picture of how much the cap moves with the borrower and the job.
RCN Capital maximum loan-to-ARV by experience and rehab size, page read October 27, 2026
| Flips in the last 3 years | Light rehab | Moderate rehab | Heavy rehab |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 or more | 75% of ARV (up to 100% of purchase price, footnoted) | 75% of ARV (up to 100% of purchase price, footnoted) | Not shown in the grid |
| 5 or more | 75% of ARV (95% of purchase) | 75% of ARV (92.5% of purchase) | 70% of ARV (85% of purchase) |
| 1 to 4 | 75% of ARV (90% of purchase) | 72.5% of ARV (90% of purchase) | 65% of ARV (80% of purchase) |
| 0 | 70% of ARV (85% of purchase) | 70% of ARV (85% of purchase) | 60% of ARV (70% of purchase) |
Each row also finances 100% of rehab costs. The 100% of purchase price figure carries a footnote on the page: five or more in-state flips, ten or more in total, a 720+ FICO score and a loan of $800,000 or less ($1,000,000 in California). The page's headline tier for up to 2 flips (70% of ARV) and its grid for 1 to 4 flips (75%, 72.5% or 65%) do not match; read your own term sheet.
What your ARV does to the loan and the 70% rule (our arithmetic)
Take the example loan from our calculator: 90% of the $215,000 purchase price plus 100% of the $45,000 rehab, which is $238,500. A lender funds the lesser of that and its cap times the ARV it accepts. The table shows the loan at four ARVs. Where a cap binds, the loan is lower than $238,500 and you bring the difference in cash.
Loan at each cap for four ARVs, example deal (the loan is the lesser of $238,500 and the cap)
| Cap | ARV needed for $238,500 | ARV $314,640 (5% under median) | ARV $316,708 (lowest comp) | ARV $331,200 (median) | ARV $345,248 (highest comp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80% (Kiavi) | $298,125 | $238,500 | $238,500 | $238,500 | $238,500 |
| 75% (Lima One; RCN experienced) | $318,000 | $235,980 (cap) | $237,531 (cap) | $238,500 | $238,500 |
| 72.5% (RCN intermediate) | $328,966 | $228,114 (cap) | $229,613 (cap) | $238,500 | $238,500 |
| 70% (RCN new investor) | $340,715 | $220,248 (cap) | $221,696 (cap) | $231,840 (cap) | $238,500 |
| 65% (RCN, 1 to 4 flips, heavy rehab) | $366,924 | $204,516 (cap) | $205,860 (cap) | $215,280 (cap) | $224,411 (cap) |
| 60% (RCN, 0 flips, heavy rehab) | $397,500 | $188,784 (cap) | $190,025 (cap) | $198,720 (cap) | $207,149 (cap) |
Three readings. First, which cap binds depends on you as much as on the house: at the median ARV the same $215,000 deal is fully funded under an 80% or 75% cap, $6,660 short under the 70% tier ($238,500 less $231,840) and $39,780 short under the heavy-rehab 60% tier. Second, the cushion is small: a 75% cap binds once the lender's ARV is below $318,000, which is 4.0% under our median. Third, a cap that binds costs cash, not just profit: if the lender's ARV is 5% under the median, a 75% lender funds $2,520 less than the full amount (our arithmetic).
The 70% rule max offer at the same ARVs (our arithmetic)
| ARV | 70% x ARV minus $45,000 rehab | Against the $215,000 contract |
|---|---|---|
| $314,640 (5% under median) | $175,248 | $39,752 below the price |
| $316,708 (lowest comp) | $176,696 | $38,304 below the price |
| $331,200 (median) | $186,840 | $28,160 below the price |
| $345,248 (highest comp) | $196,674 | $18,326 below the price |
On every ARV in the range the 70% rule says the $215,000 contract is too high. That is a filter, not a verdict: it ignores the loan, your hold time and your costs, which is why our fix and flip calculator tests the deal against your actual financing. For the $7,000 per $10,000 sensitivity, the lesson is the same as for the loan: the ARV you choose decides the answer, so choose it from the worksheet, not from the listing price you hope for.
What federal data can and cannot say about ARV
The Home Mortgage Disclosure Act file has no ARV field, so no public dataset says what value lenders used on flips. What it does report is a loan-to-value ratio, which Regulation C defines in 12 CFR 1003.4(a)(24) as “the ratio of the total amount of debt secured by the property to the value of the property relied on in making the credit decision”. On a rehab loan that value could be the purchase price, an as-is value or an after-repair value, and the field does not say which.
With that limit, here is the record. In 2025, 47,900 originated conventional, first-lien, closed-end, business-purpose loans on 1-4 unit investment properties to buy a home, with a term of 24 months or less and no reported debt-to-income ratio (our proxy for short-term flip and bridge loans, as on our rates page), totaled $20,782,980,000 with a median loan of $265,000. Of them, 42,448 report a loan-to-value ratio: the median is 70.62%, the middle half runs from 65.25% to 74.98%, and the median is 70.13% at non-bank lenders and 75% at banks and credit unions (our arithmetic). Dividing loan amount by property value on the 45,707 loans that report both gives 70.732%.
Short-term investor purchase loans in HMDA, 2025: reported loan-to-value
| Group | Loans reporting the ratio | Median | 25th to 75th percentile |
|---|---|---|---|
| All lenders | 42,448 | 70.62% | 65.25% to 74.98% |
| Non-bank lenders | 36,864 | 70.13% | 65.24% to 74.87% |
| Banks and credit unions | 4,924 | 75% | 66% to 80% |
Three quarters of these loans report a ratio at or under about 75%, which sits at or below most of the advertised caps above. Read that as consistent with them, not as proof that borrowers were at the cap: a ratio measured against a purchase price says little about leverage against the finished value, and a loan in the data can be well under its lender's cap.
What a reader can do with this
- Build the five-comp worksheet before you make an offer, using closed sales from the last 12 months and market-derived rates for each adjustment. Keep the range, not only the median.
- Re-run the loan table with your lender's cap and an ARV 5% under your median. If the cap binds there, you need the extra cash or a lower price.
- Use the RCN Capital grid as a reminder that the cap depends on you: a new investor on a heavy rehab can see 60% of ARV where an experienced one sees 75%. Ask each lender which row you are in.
- Ask the lender in writing which value it will use (its own model, an appraisal or a desk review) and whether you can supply comps.
- Run the full profit math, with points and holding costs, in the fix and flip calculator, and use the hard money loan calculator to size the loan from the lesser-of rule. For the strategy where you rent and refinance instead of selling, see the BRRRR method; for how flipping has done lately, see house flipping in 2026 and our fix and flip loans guide.
When your ARV and your numbers hold up, these lenders make fix-and-flip loans; ask each for the value it will use, its cap for your experience level, points and draw fees in writing. Our Kiavi review and Kiavi vs Lima One comparison cover two of them in detail.
FAQ
Sources: Kiavi fix-and-flip page (kiavi.com/loans/fix-and-flip), Lima One Capital FixNFlip page (limaone.com/fix-and-flip-loans), RCN Capital fix and flip page (rcncapital.com/fix-and-flip) and LendingOne fix and flip page (lendingone.com/fix-and-flip-loans), all read October 27, 2026; Fannie Mae Selling Guide B4-1.3-08, Comparable Sales, and B4-1.3-09, Adjustments to Comparable Sales, both dated June 4, 2025, read October 27, 2026; 12 CFR 1003.4(a)(24) (Regulation C); FFIEC HMDA loan-level data for 2025, counted by the script hmda_ffl_cut.py. The five comps, the adjustment rates, the $238,500 loan, the 70% rule results and every ARV, loan and cap figure in the worked example are our arithmetic on example inputs. Compiled October 27, 2026. This is analysis of public documents, not investment, legal or tax advice.
Keep reading.
- 0123 min read
DSCR Loan Arizona 2026: Top Lenders Ranked, Median Rates
Arizona lenders made 2,868 DSCR-type loans in 2025 (median 7.25%). The 20 biggest lenders ranked with rates, brokers, counties, and Arizona landlord and tax rules.
- 0228 min read
Tennessee DSCR Lenders 2026: 3,696 Loans, 133 Lenders Ranked
Federal HMDA data for 2025: Tennessee lenders made 3,696 DSCR-type investor loans (median 7.25%). Lenders ranked by loans with median rates, plus Tennessee rules.
- 0321 min read
NQDC Payout Schedule and State Tax After You Retire (4 USC 114, 409A) 2026
Retiring and moving out of a high-tax state: which nonqualified deferred compensation payouts the old state can still tax under 4 USC 114, and what 409A and FICA do to the schedule.