CrowdfundedWealth
Articles · Research note

NQDC Payout Schedule and State Tax After You Retire (4 USC 114, 409A) 2026

By Jorge··21 min read

Some links pay us a referral fee; each one says so. Disclosure

Quick Answer

As of October 28, 2026: yes, your old state can still tax a nonqualified deferred compensation payout after you move to a no-income-tax state, unless the payout fits one of two tests in 4 U.S.C. 114(b)(1)(I): (i) a series of substantially equal payments, at least once a year, for your life or a period of not less than 10 years, or (ii) a payment after you leave from a plan kept solely for benefits above the qualified-plan limits. A lump sum from an ordinary plan fits neither test, and neither does a five-year installment plan. Section 409A then decides whether you can still change the form: an election to switch must be made at least 12 months ahead and push the payment out at least five years. If your employer’s stock is publicly traded and you are a “specified employee” (a key employee), 409A forbids payment for six months after you separate. FICA is owed when the amount vests, not when it is paid. This is analysis of public documents, not tax advice.

Key Takeaways

  • 4 U.S.C. 114(a) says no State may tax “retirement income” of an individual who is not a resident or domiciliary of that State. A nonqualified plan only counts if it meets 114(b)(1)(I): payments in a series of substantially equal periodic amounts (at least annually) for life or a period of not less than 10 years, or a post-termination payment from a plan kept solely for benefits above the Code limits.
  • A qualified plan is different: a 401(a) trust, 403(b), IRA, governmental plan and the other items in 114(b)(1)(A) to (H) are protected whatever the form of payment. The periodic-payment test applies only to the nonqualified arrangements in (I).
  • California’s Franchise Tax Board read the rule the narrow way in Legal Ruling 2011-02: payments over fewer than 10 years, and lump sums, are not excluded for a nonresident. New York’s Department of Taxation has gone further for excess-benefit plans: it held in 2020 that post-termination payments from such plans are not New York source income, but payments made before termination are.
  • You cannot fix a lump-sum election at retirement. Under Treas. Reg. 1.409A-2(b)(1), a change in the time or form of payment must be made at least 12 months before it takes effect and must delay the payment at least five years.
  • If you are a specified employee of a public company, 409A requires that payments after separation from service not begin until six months later (409A(a)(2)(B)(i); Treas. Reg. 1.409A-3(i)(2)). Key-employee officers are those paid more than $235,000 in 2026, capped at 50 officers.
  • FICA is not deferred with the money. Under 3121(v)(2) an amount is wages as of the later of when the services are performed and when it is no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, then never again. For a retirement-eligible executive that can mean the whole balance is hit with Medicare tax in the retirement year.
  • The penalty for a 409A failure is inclusion of all vested deferred amounts, interest at the underpayment rate plus 1 point, and a 20% additional tax (409A(a)(1)(B)).

CSV · 34 rows

NQDC payout forms: 4 USC 114, 409A and FICA rules and rulings

34 rows: the 114(b)(1) categories and the (I) tests; the six 409A payment events, the six-month delay, the fixed-schedule and subsequent-election rules; 3121(v)(2) and 3101 FICA rates; 2026 and 2027 thresholds; the New York and California rulings; our payout-form matrix and arithmetic.

What 4 USC 114 actually protects

The statute was added by Pub. L. 104-95 in January 1996 and amended by Pub. L. 109-264 in 2006; both apply to amounts received after December 31, 1995. Subsection (a) is one sentence: no State may impose an income tax on retirement income of an individual who is not a resident or domiciliary of that State, as that State’s laws determine. “State” includes any political subdivision, so a city or county income tax is covered too (114(b)(3)).

“Retirement income” in 114(b)(1) lists nine kinds of source. Read them in two groups.

114(b)(1) itemWhat it isDoes the form of payment matter?
(A)A qualified trust under section 401(a) that is exempt under 501(a)No
(B), (C), (D), (E)A simplified employee pension (408(k)), an annuity plan (403(a)), a 403(b) contract, an individual retirement planNo
(F)An eligible deferred compensation plan as defined in section 457No
(G), (H)A governmental plan (414(d)); a 501(c)(18) trustNo
(I)Any plan, program or arrangement described in 3121(v)(2)(C), meaning a nonqualified deferred compensation plan, or a written retired-partner arrangement in effect before retirement beginsYes: income must meet test (i) or (ii)

Source: 4 U.S.C. 114(b)(1)(A) to (I), Cornell Legal Information Institute, read October 28, 2026.

So “qualified plan” for 114 means the items in (A) through (H): your 401(k), pension and IRA can be paid as a lump sum and still be shielded. A nonqualified plan is “any plan or other arrangement for deferral of compensation other than a plan described in subsection (a)(5)” of section 3121 (3121(v)(2)(C)); that is what the executive’s SERP, deferral plan or supplemental retirement plan almost always is. For those, (I) adds two tests:

  • (i) Periodic payments. Income that “is part of a series of substantially equal periodic payments (not less frequently than annually …) made for” the life or life expectancy of the recipient (or the joint lives of the recipient and a designated beneficiary), or “a period of not less than 10 years.” The statute adds that cost-of-living adjustments, or adjustments to limit total disbursements under a predetermined formula, do not break the “substantially equal” test.
  • (ii) Excess-benefit plans. Income that “is a payment received after termination of employment” under a plan maintained solely to provide retirement benefits in excess of the limits in sections 401(a)(17), 401(k), 401(m), 402(g), 403(b), 408(k) or 415, or any other Code limit on contributions or benefits. The statute does not require a lump sum to be spread out under this test.

Two consequences that are easy to miss. First, a lump sum is not automatically unprotected: if the plan is purely an excess plan and the payment comes after you leave, it can qualify under (ii). A plan that also pays a bonus deferral or a retention award is a harder case, and we did not find a ruling on a mixed plan. Second, a ten-year installment schedule from an ordinary deferral plan is protected under (i) even though it is not an excess plan. The 401(a)(17) pay limit is $360,000 for 2026 (IRS Notice 2025-67), so “excess” starts there.

What states have said

Neither state below is the final word on your plan; each ruling answers its facts.

RulingDateHeldWhat it means for a retiree who has moved
New York TSB-A-16(4)IApril 29, 2016Quarterly installments over a 10-year period, elected before retirement, from a nonqualified plan are retirement income under 114(b)(1)(I) and not subject to New York tax or withholding for a nonresidentA 10-year schedule fixed in the participation agreement worked. The petitioner had paid New York tax on his lump-sum plans and did not ask about them
New York TSB-A-20(8)IOctober 6, 2020Payments to nonresidents after termination of employment from plans kept solely for benefits above the 401(a)(17), 401(k), 401(m), 402(g) and 415 limits meet 114(b)(1)(I)(ii). Payments made before termination do notA lump sum can be shielded, but only if the plan is a pure excess plan and the payment follows termination. A 409A event that pays you while still employed is not shielded
California FTB Legal Ruling 2011-02February 25, 2011For a nonresident, payments over at least 10 years or the person’s life are excluded; payments over fewer than 10 years and lump sums are not, and remain subject to withholdingThe ruling quotes California’s periodic-payment test. We did not verify whether California has carried over the excess-benefit test in (ii)

Source: New York Department of Taxation and Finance advisory opinions TSB-A-16(4)I and TSB-A-20(8)I; California Franchise Tax Board Legal Ruling 2011-02 (a ruling about insurance agents, not executives), read October 28, 2026. Advisory opinions bind the Department only for the petitioner who asked.

The reason a nonresident can be taxed at all is source rules. California taxes a nonresident on income from California sources, and for services it looks at where they were performed (Legal Ruling 2011-02, citing R&TC 17951). New York taxes a nonresident on the items of federal adjusted gross income “derived from or connected with New York sources” (Tax Law 631(a), quoted in TSB-A-20(8)I). 114 is what overrides that, form by form. Both rulings speak of residents at the time of the payment, so the moment your domicile moves matters; how your old state tests a change of residence is a separate question that we do not cover here. Our guide to changing domicile in retirement covers the Florida side.

The matrix: form of payment, 114, 409A and FICA

This table is ours. It applies the statute and regulations to each form of payout; it is not a ruling on any plan.

Form of payoutProtected by 114?409A treatmentFICA
Lump sum at separation from an ordinary deferral or bonus planNo. It is not a series of periodic payments, and the plan is not kept solely for excess benefits. The old state can tax it as sourced income (our reading of 114(b)(1)(I); California says so expressly)Separation from service is a permitted event. A specified employee of a public company must wait six months (the payment is made after the delay)Taxed when vested, not here
Lump sum after you leave from a pure excess-benefit planYes under (I)(ii) if it is a payment “received after termination of employment”. New York agreed in 2020 for the plans it reviewedSame as above, six-month delay if a specified employeeTaxed when vested
Lump sum on a fixed date, such as January 1, 2031Same as the two rows above: depends on whether the plan is a pure excess plan and whether you have leftA time or fixed schedule fixed when the amount was deferred is a permitted event; a payment is on time if made that date or later in the same year, or by the 15th day of the third month after itTaxed when vested
Substantially equal installments, annually or more often, over 10 years or moreYes under (I)(i)Installments are one payment for the change rules unless the plan treats each as a separate payment (1.409A-2(b)(2)(iii)); changing the schedule needs 12 months’ notice and a 5-year pushTaxed when vested, not as each installment is paid
Installments over fewer than 10 years (for example 5 or 7)No, unless the plan is a pure excess plan and the payments follow termination. California says noSame rulesTaxed when vested
Life annuity or joint-and-survivor annuity from the planYes under (I)(i), life or joint livesA life annuity is treated as one payment for the subsequent-election rules (1.409A-2(b)(2)(ii))Taxed when vested; the 3121(v)(2) rules for non-account plans differ from an account balance, which we did not review
Payment before you terminate employment, for example a 409A event while you are still employedNot under (ii). New York says so; whether (i) covers an equal series started before you leave is not verifiedMust still fit one of the six permitted eventsTaxed when vested

Source: our arithmetic and reading of 4 U.S.C. 114(b)(1)(I); 26 U.S.C. 409A(a)(2); Treas. Reg. 1.409A-2(b), 1.409A-3(a), (b), (d), (i); 26 U.S.C. 3121(v)(2); New York and California rulings above.

The practical reading: the form of payment, not the size, decides the old-state exposure of an ordinary NQDC plan. A balance of $2 million paid as ten equal annual payments of $200,000 is protected; the same balance paid as a lump sum is not (unless the plan is an excess-only plan and you have separated). With an assumed 6% rate on the sourced share, our arithmetic puts that at $120,000 on the lump sum and $0 on the ten-year schedule; your state’s rate, the sourced share and federal bracket effects will differ, and spreading also changes the federal tax in each year.

409A: what fixes the schedule

Section 409A (added by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004; IRS Notice 2005-1 was the first guidance) allows a plan to pay deferred compensation only on one of six events, listed in Treas. Reg. 1.409A-3(a): separation from service, disability, death, a time or fixed schedule specified under the plan, a change in the ownership or effective control of the corporation (or a substantial portion of its assets), and an unforeseeable emergency. Notice 2005-1 itself says its principles were to be folded into later guidance; the final regulations govern, and we cite the Notice only for the penalty and FICA answers below.

The fixed schedule is fixed when you defer

Amounts are payable at a specified time or on a fixed schedule only if the dates are nondiscretionary and objectively determinable when the amount is deferred (1.409A-3(i)(1)(i)). A payout window is allowed if it begins and ends in one taxable year, or lasts no more than 90 days and you cannot choose the tax year (1.409A-3(b)). A payment counts as on time if made on the date or later in the same tax year, or by the 15th day of the third calendar month after the date, provided you cannot direct the year (1.409A-3(d)). So the schedule you elected when you deferred, usually in the year before you earned the pay, controls.

You cannot re-elect your way out at retirement

A change to the time or form of a payment is allowed only if the plan requires that the election not take effect for at least 12 months, and that the payment be deferred at least five years from when it would have been paid (409A(a)(4)(C); 1.409A-2(b)(1)). For a fixed-date payment the election must be made at least 12 months before the scheduled date. For installments treated as a single payment, the five years run from the first scheduled amount (1.409A-2(b)(1)(ii)). An executive who asks in the retirement year to turn a lump sum into a 10-year stream starting at separation is asking for what the rule forbids. The window to act is before: ask your plan administrator now whether you may elect a later start, and whether the election will take effect before you separate.

Six months of waiting for key employees of public companies

For a “specified employee,” the statute allows a distribution on separation only if it cannot be made before “6 months after the date of separation from service” (409A(a)(2)(B)(i)); the exception is the date of death. Treas. Reg. 1.409A-1(i) defines the specified employee as a key employee of a service recipient any stock of which is publicly traded on an established securities market or otherwise. A key employee under 416(i)(1)(A) is an officer paid more than $130,000 as indexed (it is $235,000 for 2026 in Notice 2025-67), a 5% owner, or a 1% owner paid over $150,000; no more than 50 employees are treated as officers (or, if lesser, the greater of 3 or 10% of employees). The reg tests the 12 months ending on the identification date, December 31 by default, and applies the result from the first day of the fourth month after it, April 1 by default (1.409A-1(i)(3), (4)).

How the delay works: payments due in the first six months can be accumulated and paid on the first day of the seventh month after separation, or each payment can be delayed six months; the employer, not you, picks the method (1.409A-3(i)(2)(ii)). Three payments are exempt from the wait: those under a domestic relations order, for conflicts of interest, and for employment taxes (1.409A-3(i)(2)(i), cross-referring to (j)(4)). For a specified employee who separates on March 15, 2027, nothing can be paid before September 15, 2027 (our arithmetic). For your plan the delay is an opportunity as well as a cost: it leaves a gap in which you can complete a move before the first payment.

The 2027 key-employee figure had not been published in the sources we found as of October 28, 2026 (not verified); the list that applies at your separation was built on prior-year pay.

The penalty

If the plan fails or is not operated according to 409A, all vested deferred compensation for the year and earlier years is included in income, with interest at the underpayment rate plus 1 percentage point on the underpayments that would have occurred, and an additional 20% of the compensation included (409A(a)(1)(A), (B); Notice 2005-1, A-2). Paying yourself early to beat a state tax is the failure the section is built to catch.

FICA: the tax you pay before the money

Section 3121(v)(2)(A) taxes an amount deferred under a nonqualified plan “as of the later of” the date the services are performed or the date it is no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, and (B) says the amount, and its later earnings, are not wages again. Treas. Reg. 31.3121(v)(2)-1(a)(2) is the same rule in regulation form. 409A does not change it (Notice 2005-1, A-37).

For a retirement-eligible executive whose plan vests on retirement, or whose award stays forfeitable only until a retirement age, that means the whole vested balance (or the newly vested slice) is FICA wages in the year it vests, even if it is paid in installments through 2037. The rates are 6.2% on wages up to the Social Security wage base, 1.45% Medicare with no cap (3101(a), (b)(1)), and 0.9% on wages above $200,000 for a single filer or $250,000 on a joint return (3101(b)(2)). The wage base is $184,500 for 2026 and $192,300 for 2027, as reported from the Social Security Administration announcement of October 14, 2026 (we could not read SSA’s own page; not verified at the source).

Example (our arithmetic, assumptions only): an executive whose 2027 pay already exceeds both the wage base and the $200,000 line has $500,000 of NQDC vest on retirement. Medicare at 1.45% is $7,250 and the additional 0.9% is $4,500: $11,750 in employee FICA on money not yet paid. If that executive’s other 2027 wages are low, up to 6.2% of $192,300, or $11,922.60, can also apply. Our Form 8959 guide walks through the additional Medicare tax. A plan may pay out money early to cover the FICA on it without breaking 409A, up to the FICA amount and the income-tax withholding on it (1.409A-3(j)(4)(vi)).

What to do before the retirement date

  1. Pull the plan document and your election form. Find the form of payment, the payment event (separation or a fixed date), and when it locked. Check whether the plan says each installment is a separate payment.
  2. Classify the plan. Is it an excess plan kept solely for benefits above the Code limits, or a deferral plan funded from bonus and salary above that? Ask the plan administrator to say so in writing.
  3. Ask whether you are a specified employee. If your employer’s stock is public, ask when the list was set and whether you are on it.
  4. Check any election window. A subsequent election must be made at least 12 months ahead and push the payment out five years; ask whether the plan allows one at all.
  5. Fix the move date and residency evidence. The rulings above frame protection by whether the recipient is a nonresident when paid. Complete the move before the first payment, with the state’s own tests in mind.
  6. Ask the payroll team what FICA has been withheld on vested balances, and what you will owe in the year of vesting.

FAQ

Update alert · free

An email when the nonqualified deferred compensation state tax rules numbers change

When a rate, rule or filing behind this page changes: what changed, the one number that matters, and the source to check it yourself.

Sources, read October 28, 2026: 4 U.S.C. 114; 26 U.S.C. 409A, 416(i), 3101 and 3121(v) (Cornell Legal Information Institute); Treas. Reg. 1.409A-1, 1.409A-2, 1.409A-3 (Cornell) and 31.3121(v)(2)-1; IRS Notice 2005-1 (irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-05-01.pdf); IRS Notice 2025-67; New York TSB-A-16(4)I and TSB-A-20(8)I; California FTB Legal Ruling 2011-02; Social Security wage bases as reported by the Journal of Accountancy, October 14, 2026. The IRS Employee Plans nonqualified deferred compensation guide and the eCFR copy of 1.409A-3 returned errors when we tried them, so we used the Cornell copies. The state tax example, FICA example and matrix are our arithmetic and reading. This is analysis of public documents, not investment, legal or tax advice; ask a qualified adviser about your own plan and state.

Affiliate Disclosure: Some links are affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This does not affect our ratings. Learn more.