Concreit vs Groundfloor 2026: $1 Minimum and 6.30% vs $10 for 9.9% — Which Wins?
Some links pay us a referral fee; each one says so. Disclosure
Quick Answer
Concreit and Groundfloor are both real estate debt platforms open to non-accredited investors, but they serve different needs. Concreit is the simpler, safer choice: $1 minimum, a 6.30% annualized payout on a $1.00 share price (Form 253G2, October 6, 2026; cut from 7.00% in October 2025), monthly redemption requests (paid pro rata if cash is short, with a 2%/1%/0% exit cost by year held and a right for the manager to amend or suspend the plan), and weekly dividend payments. Groundfloor offers higher potential returns (9.9% average 2024-25) but requires you to pick individual loans, accept a loan book whose legacy portion is 73.4% more than 90 days past due per the FY2025 Form 1-K (real users report 12-35% personal default rates; the 4.71% "official" figure is third-party and not in any filing), and accept that defaults can lock your capital for 2-5 years. For most beginners, Concreit wins on simplicity and liquidity. For investors comfortable with active management and diversifying across 30+ loans, Groundfloor's higher yield is worth the complexity.
Corrected October 15, 2026. An earlier version of this page gave Groundfloor Notes as 5.0-8.5% (September 12, 2026) and its Trustpilot score as 2.3/5; Trustpilot now shows 1.8 from 410 reviews (October 15, 2026). Groundfloor's own Notes page (groundfloor.com/notes, read October 15, 2026) lists the 12-month Signature Note at 8.0%, open to all from $1,000; the 8.5% on that page is the 12-month Preferred Note, which is for accredited investors only (Preferred Notes run 7.0% to 9.0%). The latest annual report is the FY2025 Form 1-K filed April 1, 2026 (SEC accession 0001104659-26-038396): the auditor repeated its going-concern doubt, as it has in each of Groundfloor's nine annual reports since fiscal 2017.
CSV · 14 rows
The data table in this article, as CSV
The 14-row table from this article as CSV: Feature, Concreit, Groundfloor. Sources are listed in the article.
The Core Difference
Both platforms lend money to real estate developers and pass interest payments to investors. But the structure couldn't be more different:
Concreit pools all investor capital into a single diversified fund. You own shares in the fund, not individual loans. The fund earns interest across 20 loan participations (Form 1-SA, June 30, 2026), deducts fees, and distributes the remainder weekly to your account. You don't pick loans. You don't analyze individual deals. You set it and let it run.
Groundfloor lets you browse individual fix-and-flip loans, evaluate each one, and decide which to fund. You are making individual lending decisions on specific properties. Higher potential returns, but you bear the diversification risk — if you fund 5 loans and 2 default, your personal default rate is 40% regardless of the platform average.
| Feature | Concreit | Groundfloor |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum investment | $1 | $10 (loans) / $100 (Notes/Flywheel) |
| Investment model | Pooled fund — you don't pick loans | Individual loan selection OR Notes/Flywheel |
| Target returns | 6.30% annualized payout on a $1.00 price (253G2, Oct 6, 2026) | 9.88% avg 2024-25 (loans); 5.0-8.0% (Notes open to all, Oct 7, 2026) |
| Liquidity | Monthly redemption requests, pro rata if short; 2%/1%/0% exit cost by year held; manager may amend or suspend | Loans: illiquid until maturity; Notes: term-locked; Stairs Notes: 5 days to 24 months, interest forfeited if withdrawn early |
| Dividend frequency | Weekly | Monthly (Notes) or at loan maturity (LROs) |
| Default exposure | Shared across fund — you're insulated | Per-loan — your portfolio can hit 24-35% |
| Investor fees | 1% AUM annually | $0 on loans/Notes; 0.25-1% Flywheel |
| Investment type | Debt — short-term RE loans | Debt — fix-and-flip loans + Notes |
| Regulation | Reg A+ Tier 2, RIA registered | Reg A+ Tier 2 since 2015 |
| Accreditation required | No | No |
| Tax documents | 1099-DIV | 1099-INT or 1099-OID |
| Active vs passive | Passive — no decisions required | Active (loans) or Passive (Notes/Flywheel) |
| Trustpilot | Not listed | 1.8/5 (410 reviews, Oct 15, 2026) |
| Founded | 2019 | 2013 |
Returns: Groundfloor Wins on Ceiling, Concreit Wins on Floor
Groundfloor's headline return: ~9.88% average for 2024-25. But this is the platform average, not what you'll earn. Your actual return depends entirely on which loans you pick and how many default. Users on Reddit report personal experiences ranging from 3% (heavy defaults) to 12% (strong selection and diversification). The platform's Notes product narrows this variance: 5.0% (1-month), 6.0% (3-month), 8.0% (12-month Signature Note), 7.0% to 9.0% (accredited-only Preferred Notes), as of October 7, 2026 — all with a perfect payment record since 2018, per Groundfloor.
Concreit's return: a 6.30% annualized payout on a $1.00 price as of October 2026, which is about 6.56% on the $0.96 you pay (our arithmetic). It is not fixed: it was 7.00% from November 2, 2024 until October 4, 2025. The fund spreads loan defaults across 20 loan participations.
If you're choosing purely on returns: Groundfloor's individual loans beat Concreit if you diversify across 30+ loans. Groundfloor's Notes overlap with Concreit's yield range (both in the 5-8% zone), making Notes vs Concreit a closer comparison than it first appears.
The Default Reality: Where the Comparison Gets Honest
Concreit — Default Risk Is Pooled
Concreit held 20 loan participations at June 30, 2026 (Form 1-SA) and 25 notes in the December 31, 2025 investment schedule (Form 1-K; our count, while the 1-K note text says 24 loan participations). When a loan defaults, the impact is diluted across all investors in the fund. With $6,024,926 in 20 participations, the average one is about $301,000, roughly 3.6% of total assets (our arithmetic), so a single default is not a rounding error.
This is the fundamental advantage of a pooled fund structure. Individual defaults don't wipe out a meaningful portion of your account.
The 1-K says all loan participations are secured by the underlying real property; the filings we read do not give a first-lien percentage.
Groundfloor — Default Risk Is Concentrated
The "official" 4.71% uncured default rate (28 of 594 loans) repeated across the web is a third-party figure that appears in no Groundfloor filing. The audited reality: its FY2025 Form 1-K (accession 0001104659-26-038396, filed April 1, 2026) shows 73.4% of the $88.4 million legacy loan book more than 90 days past due at December 31, 2025 ($64.9 million of $88.4 million), up from 27.5% a year earlier, with $50.8 million of loans on nonaccrual and a going-concern doubt from the auditor, as in every Groundfloor 1-K since fiscal 2017. And at the investor level:
If you invest in 10 loans and 2 default, your personal default rate is 20%. If you invest in 5 loans and 2 default, it's 40%. The platform average only applies to you if you hold enough loans to approximate the distribution — which typically means 30+ loans and $3,000+ invested.
Real investor experiences (from Reddit, verified):
- One investor: 24% default rate across 93 investments
- Another: 35% default/extended rate across 40 investments
- Multiple reports of loans stuck in "extended" or "default" status for 2-5 years
The deeper issue: when a Groundfloor loan defaults, your money is frozen. A loan marketed as 6-12 months can lock your capital for 2+ years while foreclosure proceedings work through the courts. There is no secondary market for individual loans. You wait — sometimes for years.
This is the single most important thing to understand before choosing Groundfloor over Concreit. Concreit's monthly redemption doesn't come with that risk.
Groundfloor
Real estate debt investing starting at $10 with zero investor fees. Lend to fix-and-flip developers and earn 5-12% interest. Notes offer 5.0-8.0% fixed rates for investors who are not accredited as of October 7, 2026, with a perfect payment record since 2018, per Groundfloor.
Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Liquidity: Concreit Wins Clearly
Concreit: Monthly redemptions. The offering circular says shares are redeemed pro rata at the end of each month if funds fall short, the manager may amend or suspend the plan at any time, and leaving costs 2% in the first year, 1% in the second and nothing after. The monthly supplements show a queue forming: in December 2025 requests were $1,355,203 against $304,971 processed, leaving $1,089,712 waiting. Weekly dividend payments are also cash available for reinvestment or withdrawal.
Groundfloor:
- Individual loans (LROs): No secondary market. Money is locked until the loan is repaid (6-18 months targeted) or until foreclosure resolves (potentially 2-5 years if default). True illiquidity.
- Notes: Locked for the term (1, 3, or 12 months). The 30-day and 90-day Rollover Notes have a cancelation window in the first 30 days. After that, locked.
- Flywheel Portfolio: Automatic diversification across loans, but still subject to loan-level illiquidity.
- Stairs: Stairs Notes are Groundfloor Yield LLC notes sold through its app (5 days to 24 months; interest forfeited on early withdrawal); GFY recorded $330,428,702 of Stairs Note proceeds in 2025 (gross, including rollovers).
Winner: Concreit — decisively. Monthly redemption requests are meaningfully more liquid than any Groundfloor product. The caveats: requests are paid pro rata when cash is short, the manager may suspend the plan, and the December 2025 queue shows delays can happen. But this is far less severe than a 2-5 year default lockup on Groundfloor loans.
Fees: Groundfloor Wins on Loans and Notes
| Fee | Concreit | Groundfloor |
|---|---|---|
| Individual loans | N/A | $0 |
| Notes | N/A | $0 |
| Fund / pooled option | 1% AUM annually | 0.25-1% (Flywheel only) |
| Withdrawal fee | 2% in year one, 1% in year two, then none (May 2025 circular) | None on loans/Notes |
| How platform earns | 1% AUM fee from investors | Borrower origination fees (2.75-4.25%) |
| IRA / SDIRA | Not confirmed | Yes (via Forge Trust) |
Groundfloor's zero-fee model on individual loans and Notes is a genuine structural advantage — they earn from borrowers, not investors. Concreit charges 1% AUM annually, similar to Fundrise. The 1% is charged on NAV by the manager (Form 1-SA, Note 6); the 6.30% in the pricing supplement is a distribution rate, and the filings we read do not say whether it is net of that fee.
If comparing Concreit's 1% fee to Groundfloor's Flywheel Portfolio (0.25-1%), the comparison is close. Concreit vs Groundfloor Notes is where Groundfloor's zero-fee model becomes genuinely differentiated.
Tax Treatment
Concreit: Issues a 1099-DIV. Dividend income, typically at ordinary income tax rates. Simple — plug into TurboTax, done.
Groundfloor: Issues 1099-INT (interest income on loans/Notes) or 1099-OID. Interest income is also taxed at ordinary income rates. Not dramatically different from Concreit on taxation.
Neither platform produces K-1 forms (unlike some Fundrise products). Tax simplicity is roughly equivalent.
Who Should Choose Which?
Pros
- Concreit: $1 minimum — the lowest of any pooled real estate fund
- Concreit: Monthly redemption — far better liquidity than most alternatives
- Concreit: Pooled structure protects you from individual loan defaults
- Concreit: Weekly dividend payments — satisfying cash flow visibility
- Concreit: Truly passive — no loan selection required
Cons
- Concreit: the payout is set by the manager (6.30% annualized now, cut from 7.00% in October 2025) — no upside from better selection
- Concreit: 1% of NAV a year, plus a 2%/1%/0% exit cost by year held
- Concreit: pro rata redemptions and a right to suspend could delay withdrawals (a $1.09 million queue formed in December 2025)
- Concreit: Less transparent loan-level data than Groundfloor
Pros
- Groundfloor: Zero investor fees on loans and Notes — rare in the industry
- Groundfloor: Notes have 100% on-time payment record since 2018
- Groundfloor: Higher return ceiling — 9.88% average vs Concreit's 6.30% payout
- Groundfloor: Shorter investment terms — 6-12 months on loans vs open-ended fund
- Groundfloor: Flywheel Portfolio for auto-diversification
Cons
- Groundfloor: 73.4% of the legacy loan book more than 90 days past due at Dec 31 2025 (FY2025 Form 1-K); real users report 12-35% personal default rates
- Groundfloor: Defaulted loans lock capital for 2-5 years with no exit
- Groundfloor: Requires active loan selection for best results (30+ loans)
- Groundfloor: Trustpilot 1.8/5 (410 reviews, October 15, 2026) — poor communication on troubled loans
- Groundfloor: No secondary market for individual loans
My Recommendation
Start with Concreit if you're new to real estate debt investing. The $1 minimum, monthly liquidity, and pooled structure remove three major pain points for beginners: capital commitment anxiety, illiquidity risk, and the burden of loan selection. The 6.30% payout (about 6.56% on the $0.96 price, our arithmetic) isn't spectacular, and it was cut from 7.00% in October 2025, but it doesn't come with the nightmare scenario of 35% personal default rates.
Move to Groundfloor Notes if you want higher yield without the loan-picking complexity. At 5.0-8.0% (October 7, 2026, re-read October 15) with zero fees and a perfect payment record since 2018 per Groundfloor, the 12-month Signature Note (8.0%) is above Concreit's 6.30% payout and the 3-month Note (6.0%) is slightly below it — though our forensic Groundfloor Notes review flags the going-concern qualifications in both issuers' SEC filings that the marketing leaves out. The trade-off is term lock-up (no monthly redemption) and the minimum ($100-$1,000 depending on term).
Add Groundfloor individual loans only if you're committed to diversifying across 30+ loans, can tolerate capital being frozen for 2+ years if a loan defaults, and are genuinely interested in underwriting individual fix-and-flip deals. If those conditions don't describe you, the Notes product captures most of Groundfloor's appeal without the default headaches.
The combination that makes sense for most investors: Concreit as your liquid base (emergency-accessible), Groundfloor Notes as your higher-yield locked component, and individual Groundfloor loans only if you cross the 30-loan diversification threshold.
Note: Concreit does not currently have an affiliate program. We recommend them based on research, not financial incentive. We do earn a commission if you sign up for Groundfloor through our link — see our affiliate disclosure.
Frequently Asked Questions
Concreit figures updated October 7, 2026 from its SEC filings (Forms 253G2, 1-K and 1-SA); other data as of April 2026. Data sourced from Concreit and Groundfloor official platform pages, Groundfloor's 2025 Momentum Report, Trustpilot, Reddit investor discussions, and SmartAsset. Returns are historical and not guaranteed. This article contains affiliate links — see our affiliate disclosure for details.
Keep reading.
- 0124 min read
RealT Review (2026): Detroit Lawsuit, SEC Filings, Token Terms
RealT read from the court docket, 17 SEC Form D filings, Detroit open data and its own documents. 408 properties in case 25-010288-CH, $1.4 million in unpaid tickets. As of October 13, 2026.
- 0220 min read
iCapital Review 2026: Fees, Feeder Funds, What Filings Show
iCapital, read from its own SEC and FINRA records as of October 12, 2026: $149.9 billion of discretionary assets in 1,144 private funds (Form ADV), 457 iCapital-named feeder and access funds on EDGAR reporting $21.3 billion sold, a 0.10% to 1.25% iCapital fee on top of the manager's 1% to 2% and 10% to 20% carry, $10,000 to $250,000 minimums, and a clean BrokerCheck for iCapital Markets once you skip the unrelated Datek-era record.
- 0322 min read
Doorvest Review (2026): Its SEC Filings, Fees and Annual Reports
Doorvest sells renovated rental homes and then manages them. Its own SEC filings show 96% of 2023 revenue came from home sales, a $4.3 million loss in 2024, and no annual report on EDGAR since March 2025. HomeUnion now redirects to Stessa. Every number is from a filing or Doorvest's own pages.