State Tax on Social Security 2026: Eight States, Thresholds
Some links pay us a referral fee; each one says so. Disclosure
Quick Answer
Eight states still tax Social Security in some form in 2026: Colorado, Connecticut, Minnesota, Montana, New Mexico, Rhode Island, Utah and Vermont. West Virginia, counted as the ninth in the Utah Legislature’s June 2025 brief, reaches a 100% modification for tax year 2026 (West Virginia Tax Division; Utah Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel). The relief in most of them stops at an adjusted gross income (AGI) line. For tax year 2025 the full-relief lines are $55,000 single and $70,000 joint in Vermont, $100,000 and $150,000 in New Mexico, $75,000 and $100,000 in Connecticut, $84,490 and $108,320 in Minnesota, $54,000 and $90,000 where Utah’s credit starts to shrink, and $107,000 and $133,750 in Rhode Island (state forms and statutes, read October 22, 2026). Colorado is the exception: a taxpayer 65 or older subtracts all taxable benefits with no income test. Montana lists no Social Security subtraction (our reading). For a couple with $200,000 of AGI, five states give nothing, Connecticut gives a partial subtraction, Colorado gives all of it at 65, and West Virginia gives all of it for tax year 2026 (our arithmetic). The figures are tax year 2025 unless marked 2026; 2026 forms are not out yet.
Key Takeaways
- Colorado is not a ‘taxes Social Security’ state for anyone 65 or older. The Department of Revenue says a taxpayer age 65 or older at the end of the year may subtract the entire amount of Social Security benefit income included in federal taxable income. Ages 55 to 64 get the same subtraction only if AGI is at or below $75,000 (single) or $95,000 (joint) starting with tax year 2025; above that the cap stays at $20,000 (Colorado DOR, Income Tax Topics, revised January 2025).
- Five states switch relief off at an AGI line. Vermont: full at $55,000 or less (single) and $70,000 or less (joint), none at $65,000 and $80,000 (32 V.S.A. section 5830e). New Mexico: none above $100,000 single or $150,000 joint (2025 PIT-ADJ, line 25). Rhode Island: none above $107,000 single or $133,750 joint, and only after full retirement age (ADV 2025-22). Minnesota: 10% less for each $4,000 over $84,490 or $108,320, so zero above $120,490 or $144,320 (our arithmetic from Schedule M1M). Utah: credit shrinks $0.025 per dollar over $54,000 or $90,000 (S.B. 71, 2025).
- Connecticut never goes to zero relief. Above $75,000 (single) or $100,000 (joint) the Line 41 worksheet leaves taxable only Line D, 25% of Line C, because the subtraction on Line F is Line E minus Line D (our reading) (2025 Form CT-1040 Instructions). Montana is the opposite: the 2025 Form 2 instructions list a $5,660 subtraction at age 65 ($11,320 if both spouses qualify) and no Social Security subtraction.
- Every one of these tests uses AGI or modified AGI, so rental income, K-1 income and REIT, BDC and fund distributions count toward the cliff the same way wages do (our reading of the AGI definitions in each document). A household with AGI of $200,000 or more is past the cutoff in Vermont, New Mexico, Rhode Island, Minnesota and Utah; Colorado at 65 and West Virginia in 2026 have no cutoff (our reading).
- Two numbers move in the next 15 months. Rhode Island’s FY2027 budget (House Bill 7127 Substitute A) removes the full-retirement-age test for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027 and keeps the income limit (Division of Taxation 2026 summary). West Virginia’s modification above $50,000 (single) or $100,000 (joint) goes from 65% for tax year 2025 to 100% for tax year 2026 (Tax Division).
- State pages disagree with their own statutes. The Vermont Department of Taxes page says in prose that the joint exemption is full to $65,000 and phases out between $70,000 and $75,000, while its table says full to $70,000 and partial to $79,999; the statute says $70,000 and $80,000. Rhode Island prints the 2025 joint limit as $133,750 in an advisory and $133,500 in its Retirement Income Guide. We use the statute for Vermont and show both Rhode Island figures.
CSV · 79 rows
State tax on Social Security: thresholds, phase-outs and 2026 changes, nine states
79 rows: for Colorado, Connecticut, Minnesota, Montana, New Mexico, Rhode Island, Utah, Vermont and West Virginia, the AGI lines, phase-out rules, form lines or statutes, the 2026 changes found, and a joint-filer example at $200,000 of AGI (our arithmetic), each with the state document it comes from.
The eight states in one table
Read this as tax year 2025, the year whose returns are filed in 2026. The federal rule underneath is IRC section 86, covered on our page on how much Social Security is taxable with rental and K-1 income: up to 50% of benefits is taxable above $25,000 (single) or $32,000 (joint) of provisional income and up to 85% above $34,000 or $44,000. The states start from that federal taxable amount, then subtract some or all of it.
| State | Who gets relief | Single line (AGI) | Joint line (AGI) | Above the line | Where it is claimed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colorado | Age 65 or older: all taxable benefits subtracted. Age 55 to 64: all taxable benefits if AGI is at or below the line | 65+: no line. 55-64: $75,000 | 65+: no line. 55-64: $95,000 | Age 55 to 64: subtraction capped at $20,000 | DR 0104AD; DOR Income Tax Topics (rev. January 2025) |
| Connecticut | Full exemption below the line, partial above | Under $75,000 | Under $100,000 (joint, surviving spouse, head of household) | Partial: Line F = Line E minus Line D; Line D = 25% of Line C | Form CT-1040 Line 41 |
| Minnesota | Greater of the simplified and the alternative subtraction | $84,490 (2026: $86,410) | $108,320 (2026: $110,780) | Simplified subtraction falls 10% per $4,000 of AGI or fraction; zero above $120,490 single / $144,320 joint (2026: $122,410 / $146,780), our arithmetic | Schedule M1M line 12; Minn. Stat. 290.0132 subd. 26 |
| Montana | No Social Security subtraction listed | None | None | Taxable benefits stay in AGI. Separate $5,660 subtraction at 65 (both spouses 65+: $11,320) for any income | Form 2 line 6 |
| New Mexico | Exemption of benefits in AGI, all or nothing | $100,000 | $150,000 (also head of household, surviving spouse) | No part exempt. Married filing separately line: $75,000 | PIT-ADJ line 25 |
| Rhode Island | Modification for those at full retirement age | $107,000 | $133,750 (advisory) or $133,500 (guide) | None. Age test ends for tax years beginning January 1, 2027 | RI-1040; R.I. Gen. Laws 44-30-12 |
| Utah | Credit of 4.5% of the benefits, phased down | Credit starts shrinking over $54,000 | Over $90,000 (also head of household) | Credit falls $0.025 for each dollar of modified AGI over; zero at the line plus 1.8 times taxable benefits (our arithmetic) | TC-40A code AH; Utah Code 59-10-1042 |
| Vermont | Exclusion, full then proportional | Full at $55,000 or less | Full at $70,000 or less | Proportional over $10,000; none at $65,000 single / $80,000 joint | Form IN-112; 32 V.S.A. 5830e |
| West Virginia (leaving) | Decreasing modification | Full at $50,000 or less | Full at $100,000 or less | Above: 35% (2024), 65% (2025), 100% (2026) | W. Va. Code 11-21-12(c)(8) |
Colorado’s age test and Montana’s absence of any Social Security rule are the two results that surprised us against the press lists we started from, which put both in the same bucket as Vermont. For a retiree with large income they are opposites: at 65 Colorado subtracts everything, while Montana taxes the federal taxable amount with only its general age-65 subtraction.
What a $250,000 household actually gets
The table is easiest to read with a case. Take a couple filing jointly, both 66, with $48,000 of benefits. Their other income is large enough that 85% of the benefits is taxable at the federal level, which is $40,800 (our arithmetic: 85% x $48,000). Total AGI is $200,000.
| State | Benefits relieved on the state return | Why (our arithmetic) |
|---|---|---|
| Colorado | $40,800 (both 65 or older) | No income test at 65. If they were 55 to 64, AGI is above $95,000, so the cap is $20,000 |
| Connecticut | Partial | AGI is above $100,000; taxable amount left is Line D, 25% of Line C. Line C needs the federal worksheet lines, so we do not compute it |
| Minnesota | $0 | AGI is $91,680 over $108,320, so the tenth step is reached and the simplified subtraction is zero; the alternative method is also zero at this income |
| Montana | $0 specific to benefits | The $11,320 age-65 subtraction applies to any income, not only benefits |
| New Mexico | $0 | AGI is above the $150,000 line |
| Rhode Island | $0 | AGI is above $133,750 |
| Utah | $0 | Credit before phase-out is $1,836 (4.5% x $40,800); the reduction is $2,750 (0.025 x $110,000 over $90,000); $1,836 minus $2,750 is below zero |
| Vermont | $0 | AGI is above $80,000 |
| West Virginia | $40,800 for tax year 2026 | The modification above $100,000 joint is 100% in 2026 |
In Utah the credit is zero once modified AGI reaches the threshold plus 1.8 times the taxable benefits, because 0.045 divided by 0.025 is 1.8 (our arithmetic). A single filer with $30,000 of taxable benefits loses the whole credit at $108,000 ($54,000 plus 1.8 x $30,000). The Utah Tax Commission’s TC-40A worksheet uses Utah taxable income plus some add-backs rather than plain AGI, so treat AGI here as a proxy.
Minnesota: the cliff is ten steps wide
Minnesota is the only one of these states with two methods. The simplified subtraction is the taxable benefits on Form 1040 line 6b, reduced by 10% for each $4,000 of AGI over the line, or fraction of $4,000 (Minn. Stat. 290.0132 subd. 26(c)). The Schedule M1M worksheet divides the excess by $4,000, rounds up and stops at ten. Any excess over $36,000 therefore reaches ten steps, which is why the zero point is $120,490 single and $144,320 joint for 2025. The alternative method is a fixed maximum, $4,560 single and $5,840 joint, reduced by 20% of provisional income over $69,250 or $88,630. The return takes the greater of the two. The Department of Revenue’s 2026 inflation table raises the simplified lines to $86,410 and $110,780 and leaves the alternative amounts not indexed.
Rhode Island and West Virginia: the two that are changing
Rhode Island’s modification needs three things: taxable benefits in federal AGI, full retirement age under Social Security rules, and AGI under the limit. The Division of Taxation’s advisory ADV 2025-22 puts the 2025 limit at $107,000 for single and head-of-household filers and $133,750 for joint filers; the Retirement Income Guide for tax year 2025 prints $133,500 for joint. The Division’s 2026 summary of legislative changes says the FY2027 budget, House Bill 7127 Substitute A, eliminates the age requirement for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027 and keeps the income threshold. That adds people under full retirement age who are below the income line; it does nothing for a household above it. The same guide raised the pension and annuity modification from $20,000 to $50,000 per person for 2025.
West Virginia’s Tax Division says taxable benefits became 100% exempt from tax year 2022 for federal AGI of $50,000 or less ($100,000 joint), then phased in a decreasing modification above that: 35% for tax year 2024, 65% for 2025 and 100% for 2026. The page adds that a taxpayer takes the higher of the $8,000 senior modification or the sum of the itemized modifications, which include taxable benefits. West Virginia is therefore a state where a high-income retiree stops owing tax on benefits with the 2026 return, filed in 2027.
Pensions, IRAs, rental and K-1 income
Social Security is one line in these states; the other retirement income is where the money usually is. What we read:
| State | Pension, annuity and IRA treatment in the documents read | Rental and K-1 income |
|---|---|---|
| Colorado | Pension and annuity subtraction capped at $24,000 at 65 and older and $20,000 at 55 to 64; any Social Security subtraction claimed reduces it | Not a qualifying source; it raises AGI and so the 55 to 64 test |
| Connecticut | IRA distributions (not Roth): 75% subtracted; pensions and annuities: the line 5b amount, when the AGI answers on the worksheet are below $75,000 single or $100,000 joint | Not a qualifying source; it raises Line 1 AGI |
| Rhode Island | Up to $50,000 per person of taxable pension and annuity income for 2025, same AGI limits and full-retirement-age test | Not a qualifying source; counts in AGI |
| Vermont | Social Security, Civil Service Retirement and other qualifying contributory-system income are alternatives: a taxpayer must elect only one exclusion | Counts in federal AGI for the Social Security lines |
| Utah | The Social Security credit cannot be claimed together with the Retirement Credit (code 18) | Counts in the income used for the phase-out |
| Minnesota, Montana, New Mexico | Not covered on this page | Counts in AGI for the lines above |
The practical rule is the one our federal page already shows: rental net income, K-1 income, REIT and BDC dividends and a Roth conversion enter AGI and the provisional-income test. In these states they also move AGI across a state cutoff, so a year with a large conversion or a property sale can cost the whole exclusion in Vermont, New Mexico, Rhode Island or Minnesota even if the next year does not. For the federal side see our Roth conversion calculator.
Bills that lost, and what we could not confirm
Colorado SB25-136, which would have removed the pension and annuity caps from 2026, shows status Lost on the General Assembly page. HB26-1062, the 2026 version for tax years from January 1, 2027, was postponed indefinitely by the House Committee on Finance. Colorado’s rules therefore stand as written above. New Mexico’s SB 156 (2026) proposed removing the income cap; its Legislative Finance Committee fiscal impact report was last updated February 3, 2026. We could not retrieve the Legislature’s action history for it, so we do not state its outcome; the 2025 PIT-ADJ still prints the caps, and the 2026 form is not out.
We read primary documents for nine states. The Utah Legislature’s research brief counts nine states that tax Social Security in some capacity, and the nine it lists are the nine here. We did not read the statutes of the other 41 states and the District of Columbia, so this page makes no claim about them beyond that count.
Estate and property tax on the same retirees
Several of these states also levy an estate tax. If you are weighing a move, read the state page next to this one: Connecticut, Minnesota, Rhode Island and Vermont, or the full state list. Property tax relief for seniors is on our senior property tax exemption page, and state treatment of Treasury interest in our state tax on Treasury interest table. Next year’s benefit amounts are on our 2027 cost-of-living page.
What a reader can do with this
- Find your state’s line and your own AGI. Last year’s Form 1040 line 11 is the starting point. Compare it with the single or joint line in the table, and with the zero point in Minnesota and Utah, which sit above the printed line.
- Look at the year, not only the income. A one-time sale, conversion or large K-1 can put AGI over the cutoff for one year. In an all-or-nothing state such as New Mexico or Rhode Island that costs the whole exclusion; in Vermont and Minnesota it is proportional.
- Check the age and filing status tests. Colorado turns on age 65 and Rhode Island, until 2027, on full retirement age. Vermont puts separate filers, heads of household and surviving spouses on the single line.
- Do not trust a one-line list. Colorado at 65 and Montana are not the same kind of state, and the Vermont and Rhode Island official pages carry figures that disagree with their own statute or guide.
- Watch the dates. Tax year 2026 forms for Colorado, Connecticut, Utah, Vermont, Montana and New Mexico are published from late 2026 into early 2027, and the figures can change. A planner or CPA in the state can run the actual return.
This is analysis of public documents, not investment, legal or tax advice.
FAQ
Update alert · free
An email when the state tax on social security rules and thresholds numbers change
When a rate, rule or filing behind this page changes: what changed, the one number that matters, and the source to check it yourself.
Sources, read and saved on October 22, 2026: Colorado Department of Revenue, Income Tax Topics: Social Security, Pensions and Annuities (revised January 2025), and General Assembly pages for SB25-136 and HB26-1062; Connecticut DRS, 2025 Form CT-1040 Instructions (Rev. 12/25); Minnesota Department of Revenue, 2025 Schedule M1M, Social Security Benefit Subtraction page and inflation-adjusted amounts for 2026, and Minn. Stat. 290.0132; Montana Department of Revenue, 2025 Form 2 Instructions and Overview of Changes to Form 2; New Mexico Taxation and Revenue, 2025 PIT-ADJ Instructions, and the Legislative Finance Committee fiscal impact report for SB 156 (2026); Rhode Island Division of Taxation, ADV 2025-22, Retirement Income Guide 2026-01 and the 2026 summary of legislative changes; Utah S.B. 71 (2025) as enrolled, the Tax Commission’s 2025 TC-40A instructions and the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel brief of June 17, 2025; Vermont Department of Taxes Social Security Exemption page and 32 V.S.A. section 5830e; West Virginia Tax Division, Social Security Modification page. The example figures, zero points and group counts are our arithmetic from those documents.
Keep reading.
- 0124 min read
401(k) Rollover to an IRA in 2026: Direct, 60-Day, Withholding
401(k) to IRA rollover rules from the Code and IRS Pubs 590-A and 575: direct vs 60-day, 20% withholding, what cannot roll, and the once-a-year limit.
- 0221 min read
529 Superfunding 2026: $95,000, Form 709 and the Roth Rollover
A 529 can take $95,000 per child in 2026 ($190,000 for a couple) under the five-year election. Form 709 steps, death inside 5 years, the $35,000 Roth rollover.
- 0321 min read
Additional Medicare Tax 2026: Form 8959, Rent, REIT and K-1 Income
The 0.9% Additional Medicare Tax hits wages and self-employment income over $200,000 ($250,000 joint), not rent or REIT dividends. IRS data and worked examples.