Exchange Funds for Concentrated Stock: 7-Year Rule, 20% Sleeve
Some links pay us a referral fee; each one says so. Disclosure
Quick Answer
An exchange fund lets an investor with a large, low-basis stock position contribute it to a partnership with other investors' stock and receive an interest in the pool, and the tax law allows that without tax only if the pool is not an “investment company”. Section 721(a) says “No gain or loss shall be recognized to a partnership or to any of its partners in the case of a contribution of property to the partnership in exchange for an interest in the partnership”; Section 721(b) switches that off for a partnership that “would be treated as an investment company (within the meaning of section 351) if the partnership were incorporated”. The Treasury regulation puts the test at more than 80 percent of asset value in readily marketable stocks or securities, which is why Eaton Vance's Belcrest Capital Fund told the SEC it “normally invests at least 20% of its assets” in real estate. The 20% is not a number in the Code; the 80% is in Treas. Reg. 1.351-1(c)(1)(ii). The lock-up comes from Section 704(c)(1)(B): if contributed property is distributed to another partner within 7 years, the contributor recognizes the built-in gain. As of October 30, 2026 we found 20 Form D issuers with “exchange fund” in their name (excluding 1031 and real estate vehicles); 10 report sales, together $1,685,021,463 (our arithmetic), led by Fidelity Exchange Fund, LP at $486,597,697 from 322 investors (Form D/A filed June 26, 2026) and Cache Exchange Fund - Unix, LLC at $467,045,071 from 349 investors (filed May 5, 2026). One thing the Code does not say anywhere: Treas. Reg. 1.704-4(a)(1) on eCFR still reads “five years”, although the statute has said 7 since 1997.
Key Takeaways
- Three Code sections do the work: 721(b) and 351(e)(1) decide whether the contribution is tax-free at all, and 704(c)(1)(B) (with 737) decides what happens if the contributed stock is handed to someone else within 7 years.
- The “20% in real estate” is market practice built on the regulation's 80% test (Treas. Reg. 1.351-1(c)(1)(ii)), not a statutory figure. Eaton Vance's Belcrest 10-K says the fund “normally invests at least 20% of its assets as so determined in certain real estate investments”, yet the same 10-K reports real estate at 13.1% of total assets at December 31, 2011.
- In five of six Eaton Vance 10-Ks we read (fiscal years 2007 to 2011), the fund's borrowings were larger than its real estate investments: for example $144.0 million against $130.7 million at Belcrest on December 31, 2010 (our comparison).
- The statute says 7 years; Treas. Reg. 1.704-4(a)(1) as published on eCFR still says “five years”. The 7-year period applies to property contributed after June 8, 1997 (Pub. L. 105-34, section 1063(b)).
- Form D census: 20 issuers with “exchange fund” in the name, 10 with sales, $1,685,021,463 in total (our arithmetic). Fidelity Exchange Fund, LP went from $108,124,485 and 87 investors (June 2024) to $486,597,697 and 322 (June 2026).
- All five Eaton Vance Capital Fund registrants we read filed Form 15 between November 2008 and March 2012. Today's funds are private placements; their terms are in offering documents that are not public on EDGAR.
CSV · 140 rows
Exchange funds: the tax-code text, six Eaton Vance fund 10-Ks and 20 Form D filers
140 rows: Code and regulation text, Eaton Vance Capital Fund 10-K figures (2007 to 2011) and the latest Form D of 20 issuers named exchange fund.
The problem an exchange fund solves
You hold a large position in one stock, bought or granted long ago, with a basis far below its value. Selling it realizes the gain. An exchange fund is the alternative that investors and advisers talk about: contribute the shares to a pool, receive an interest in the pool, and own a share of a diversified portfolio instead of one company. The Code makes that tax-free in only one narrow way, and the rest of this page is that way, read from the text.
Eaton Vance, the best-documented sponsor because its funds filed 10-Ks, described the purpose in plain words. Belcrest Capital Fund LLC is “a private investment company organized by Eaton Vance Management (Eaton Vance) to provide diversification and tax-sensitive investment management to investors holding large and concentrated positions in equity securities of selected public companies” (Form 10-K for 2011, accession 0000950123-12-004648).
Step one: the contribution (Sections 721 and 351)
| Rule | Source | What it says |
|---|---|---|
| Partnership contributions are tax-free | 26 U.S.C. 721(a) | No gain or loss is recognized to the partnership or its partners on a contribution of property in exchange for a partnership interest. |
| Except for investment companies | 26 U.S.C. 721(b) | Subsection (a) does not apply to gain realized on a transfer to a partnership which would be treated as an investment company within the meaning of section 351 if it were incorporated. |
| What an investment company is (statute) | 26 U.S.C. 351(e)(1) | A transfer to an investment company is excepted from section 351; the determination takes into account all stock and securities held, with money, stocks, bonds, options, derivatives and interests in REITs and regulated investment companies counted as stock and securities. |
| What an investment company is (regulation) | Treas. Reg. 1.351-1(c)(1) | The transfer results in diversification of the transferors' interests and the transferee is a regulated investment company, a REIT, or a corporation more than 80 percent of the value of whose assets (excluding cash and nonconvertible debt) are readily marketable stocks or securities. |
| Single stock is diversification; a diversified basket is not | Treas. Reg. 1.351-1(c)(5), (c)(6)(i) | Transfers of nonidentical assets by two or more persons ordinarily result in diversification, but a transfer of a diversified portfolio (25 and 50-percent tests) does not. |
| Basis carries over | 26 U.S.C. 722, 723 | Your basis in the fund interest, and the fund's basis in the stock, equal your adjusted basis in the stock at contribution, increased by any gain recognized under 721(b). |
Read together, these explain the design. Many people contributing single, nonidentical positions is diversification by definition, so the fund would be an investment company unless a fifth or more of its value sits in something that is not a readily marketable stock or security. Section 351(e)(1)(B) lists what counts as stock and securities, including “any interest in a real estate investment trust”; direct ownership of real property is not on the list (our reading). So the sponsor buys real estate, and the filing language follows the regulation: Belcrest's 10-K says that for the contributions to be nontaxable “not more than 80% of the Fund's assets (calculated in the manner prescribed) may consist of ‘stocks and securities’ as defined in the Code” and that it “normally invests at least 20% of its assets as so determined in certain real estate investments”.
One caution on dates. Section 351(e)(1) in its present form applies to transfers after June 8, 1997 (Pub. L. 105-34, section 1002(b)). The regulation's 80 percent test is older text. Which number the Treasury applies to the statute's broader list is not stated in the statute; the 10-K figure is the sponsor's reading, and we do not give a view on it.
Step two: the seven-year rule (Sections 704(c)(1)(B) and 737)
The contributed stock keeps its old basis inside the fund (Section 723), so the built-in gain stays with the contributing partner. Section 704(c)(1)(B) protects the Treasury from that gain being shifted to someone else: “if any property so contributed is distributed (directly or indirectly) by the partnership (other than to the contributing partner) within 7 years of being contributed”, the contributing partner “shall be treated as recognizing gain or loss (as the case may be) from the sale of such property”. Section 737(b)(1) is the mirror image: if the contributor receives other property from the partnership, gain is measured on property the contributor put in “within 7 years of the distribution”.
Worked example (our arithmetic). You contribute stock worth $1,000,000 with a basis of $100,000, a built-in gain of $900,000. Five years later the fund distributes that same stock to another investor when it is worth $1,200,000. Section 704(c)(1)(B)(i) measures your gain by “the variation” between basis and value at contribution, so the amount at stake is up to the $900,000 built in at contribution, not the later $200,000, which the partnership agreement allocates among partners. After seven years the same distribution does not trigger the rule.
Exchange fund documents follow the statute. Belcrest's 10-K: “Securities contributed by a Shareholder may be distributed to other Shareholders in the Fund (or to other investors in Belvedere Company or the Portfolio) after a holding period of at least seven years and, if so distributed, would not be available to meet subsequent redemption requests made by the contributing Shareholder.” That is the lock-up in practice: it is a tax design, not only a sales feature.
Five years or seven? Both numbers circulate. The statute changed from 5 to 7: “Pub. L. 105-34 substituted ‘7 years’ for ‘5 years’ in introductory provisions”, effective for property contributed to a partnership after June 8, 1997. The regulation on eCFR (current as of October 28, 2026) still says the partner “must recognize gain or loss under section 704(c)(1)(B) and this section on the distribution of such property to another partner within five years of its contribution”. We rely on the statute; a reader comparing sources will find both.
What a real fund's 10-K showed, 2007 to 2011
Between 1998 and 2002 Eaton Vance launched Belair, Belcrest, Belmar, Belport and Belrose Capital Funds. Each had more than 300 record holders and filed annual reports on Form 10-K. We read six of them, each the last or one of the last annual reports available. All numbers are as stated in the filings.
| Fund, 10-K year | Net assets | Real estate, share of total assets | Stock portfolio, share of total assets | Borrowings | Record holders |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belair, 2007 | about $0.9 billion | $271.1 million, 21.0% | 78.4% | $312.0 million | 327 |
| Belmar, 2008 | about $641.6 million | $165.4 million, 17.9% | 81.8% | $273.0 million | 392 |
| Belport, 2009 | about $614.9 million | $161.3 million, 20.0% | 79.2% | $185.5 million | 327 |
| Belrose, 2009 | about $708.0 million | $191.1 million, 19.3% | 79.8% | $200.0 million | 372 |
| Belcrest, 2010 | about $648.0 million | $130.7 million, 16.4% | 83.0% | $144.0 million | 339 |
| Belcrest, 2011 | about $633.0 million | $93.4 million, 13.1% | 86.7% | $78.0 million | 309 |
Three readings, none of them a judgment on the funds.
- The sleeve is real and borrowed. Each 10-K says the fund “acquires its real estate investments with borrowed funds”. In five of the six filings the borrowings are larger than the real estate (at Belcrest on December 31, 2010: $144.0 million against $130.7 million, 110%, our arithmetic); the facility was not used only for real estate, so this is a comparison, not an accounting. A shareholder owns a leveraged real estate position they did not choose, alongside the stock pool.
- The 20% was on a tax measure, not on the balance sheet. Reported real estate shares range from 21.0% to 13.1% of total assets. The 10-K calls the 20% a share of assets “as so determined” and “calculated in the manner prescribed”, and does not reconcile it to the GAAP figure. We cannot say how the test was computed.
- The real estate does not come back to you. On redemption “No interests in Subsidiary Real Estate Investments, Partnership Preference Units or other real property investments will be distributed to meet a redemption request”; the fund pays mainly in securities, and “if a redeeming Shareholder receives cash in addition to securities to settle a redemption, the amount of cash received will be taxable to the Shareholder to the extent it exceeds such Shareholder's tax basis in Fund Shares”. Belcrest also reported that fees paid to Eaton Vance and its affiliates were about 1.06% of average net assets for 2011.
One structural detail shows how closely the design follows the Code: Belcrest Realty, the real estate subsidiary, elects REIT status, and its preferred shares “are owned by not less than 100 charitable organizations”, because a REIT needs 100 or more owners.
None of the five funds reports to the SEC now: Form 15 filings were made on November 6, 2008 (Belair), February 19, 2010 (Belmar), July 9, 2010 (Belport), October 8, 2010 (Belrose) and March 22, 2012 (Belcrest) according to EDGAR's filing lists. We use them because they are the only audited, public descriptions of how the structure works; they are not a description of any fund you can buy today.
Who files a Form D today: 20 issuers named “exchange fund”
Current exchange funds are private placements. They owe the SEC a Form D, which shows who raised how much, but not the lock-up, the real estate share or the fees. We read the SEC's quarterly Form D data sets from the first quarter of 2014 through the third quarter of 2026 and kept every issuer whose name contains “exchange fund”, then removed the vehicles for 1031 exchanges (PV 1031 Exchange Fund III) and the two real estate vehicles (Monroe Exchange Fund and Monroe Exchange Fund II). That leaves 20 issuers. For each we take its most recent filing (the latest amendment), and its “total amount sold” and “total number already invested”. A Form D amount is a cumulative figure as the issuer reports it; it is not performance, and it says nothing about whether any fund is well run. Funds that do not have “exchange fund” in their name, which includes some of the largest sponsors' products, are not in this count, so it is a floor.
| Issuer (latest Form D filing) | Total amount sold | Investors | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fidelity Exchange Fund, LP | $486,597,697 | 322 | June 26, 2026 |
| Cache Exchange Fund - Unix, LLC | $467,045,071 | 349 | May 5, 2026 |
| Cache Exchange Fund - Bedrock, LLC | $229,315,603 | 227 | May 5, 2026 |
| Gotham Triple Exchange Fund LP | $162,756,634 | 146 | November 10, 2025 |
| Diversified Exchange Fund All-Cap, LLC | $144,652,960 | 48 | March 23, 2026 |
| Diversified Exchange Fund Large-Cap, LLC | $54,454,410 | 23 | March 23, 2026 |
| Collective Exchange Fund, L.P. | $53,350,358 | 78 | November 19, 2025 |
| Cache Exchange Fund - Mosaic, LLC | $44,868,967 | 62 | May 5, 2026 |
| Cache Exchange Fund - Fortran, LLC | $37,479,763 | 87 | December 11, 2025 |
| Civitas Hudson Exchange Fund, LP | $4,500,000 | 9 | January 22, 2025 |
The other ten of the 20 report nothing sold on their latest filing: Diversification Partners Exchange Fund LP (2014), Liquidax Global Exchange Fund I, LP (2017), Cincinnati Exchange Fund, LP (2021), Fidelity Exchange Fund REIT, LLC (2023), Cache Exchange Fund I, LLC, Cache Exchange Fund - GNU, LLC and Cache Exchange Fund - COBOL, LLC, Dimensional US Equity Exchange Fund I LP (August 1, 2025), and two NonPublic Exchange Fund series (2026). The ten that report sales add to $1,685,021,463 (our arithmetic). The investors are not additive across funds, because one household can be in several, and the dates differ.
Two fast-growing examples show amendments over time:
| Fund | Filing | Total amount sold | Investors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fidelity Exchange Fund, LP | Form D/A, June 28, 2024 | $108,124,485 | 87 |
| Fidelity Exchange Fund, LP | Form D/A, June 27, 2025 | $267,539,257 | 234 |
| Fidelity Exchange Fund, LP | Form D/A, June 26, 2026 | $486,597,697 | 322 |
| Cache Exchange Fund - Unix, LLC | Form D/A, June 25, 2025 | $189,439,211 | 175 |
| Cache Exchange Fund - Unix, LLC | Form D/A, May 5, 2026 | $467,045,071 | 349 |
In two years Fidelity's reported total rose 4.5 times and its investor count 3.7 times; Cache Unix's reported total rose 2.5 times in under a year (our arithmetic). The Form D does not say how contributed stock is valued in these totals, and it does not say how much of any fund is in real estate. The sponsors' offering documents do, and we have not seen them.
What a reader can do with this
This is analysis of public documents, not investment, legal or tax advice. Here is what the documents let you check before you talk to anyone.
- Ask for the offering memorandum and read three things in it: the stated lock-up and what happens if you leave early (the Eaton Vance 10-K says a redemption is met mainly with securities, not your original shares, and not with real estate); the real estate share and how much of it is financed; and the fees.
- Compare the alternatives on the same page. A sale realizes the gain now. A 1031 exchange only reaches real property (our 1031 rules page). A fund that holds real estate through an operating partnership is a different tool, the 721 exchange for real estate owners (721 exchange and DST programs). Gift or charitable routes are another family (charitable remainder trusts), and a death transfer gets a new basis (step-up in basis). Opportunity zone funds defer gain only from sales (opportunity zone 2.0).
- Ask who the other contributors are. Section 704(c)(1)(B) and Section 721(b) turn on what the fund does with what you put in, so the fund's ability to avoid distributing your shares for seven years matters as much as the headline diversification.
- Ask what the fund tells you about the 20%. The Eaton Vance 10-K shows the share can sit well under 20% on the balance sheet and still be described as “at least 20%” on a tax measure. Ask for the measurement date and method.
If the stake is large, a tax adviser who has read the actual fund documents is the right next step, and the questions above are what to bring.
Update alert · free
An email when the exchange funds numbers change
When a rate, rule or filing behind this page changes: what changed, the one number that matters, and the source to check it yourself.
How this was built, and its limits
The tax text is from the U.S. Code as published by Cornell's Legal Information Institute and the Code of Federal Regulations on eCFR (October 28, 2026 edition), read October 30, 2026; the credit lines of Sections 704, 351 and 721 end at Pub. L. 115-97 (2017), Pub. L. 109-135 (2005) and Pub. L. 105-34 (1997), and we did not find the 2025 law in them (our reading of the credit lines; we did not read the 2025 law itself for this page). The Eaton Vance numbers are from six Form 10-K filings; fund terms may differ from today's sponsors. The Form D census is a name search: it does not capture exchange funds without those words in their names, it ends with the third-quarter 2026 data set, and it cannot tell us which of the 20 accept concentrated public stock; for the NonPublic and Collective funds, for example, the Form D does not tell us what is contributed. We have not read any current exchange fund's offering memorandum.
FAQ
Sources
Read October 30, 2026. 26 U.S. Code Sections 721, 351, 704, 737, 722, 723 and 731 (Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School); Treas. Reg. 1.351-1 and 1.704-4 (eCFR, current as of October 28, 2026). Eaton Vance Capital Fund Forms 10-K on SEC EDGAR: Belair Capital Fund LLC (CIK 1050816), accession 0001104659-08-014365; Belmar Capital Fund LLC (CIK 1108991), 0000950135-09-001375; Belport Capital Fund LLC (CIK 1138602), 0000950123-10-019493; Belrose Capital Fund LLC (CIK 1170304), 0000950123-10-019491; Belcrest Capital Fund LLC (CIK 1070495), 0000950123-11-019909 and 0000950123-12-004648. Form 15 filings from EDGAR filing lists. SEC Form D data sets, 2014 first quarter to 2026 third quarter.
Keep reading.
- 0119 min read
401(k) Loan vs Hardship vs $1,000 Emergency Withdrawal, 2026
Loan, hardship distribution or SECURE 2.0 emergency withdrawal: the Code limits, the 10% tax, the job-exit trap and the cost of a $50,000 need, in dollars.
- 0220 min read
ABS Long/Short Strategies Fund Tender: 6.8% of Offers Used
ABS Long/Short Strategies Fund offers up to 25% of NAV until Nov 27, 2026. Holders used 6.8% of 27 past offers; one pension fund owns 35.68%. SEC filings, CSV.
- 0320 min read
Angel Oak Residential Evergreen Trust: Series Fees and Exit
Angel Oak's new mortgage REIT (Form 10, Oct 19, 2026): 0.75% fee, 8% hurdle on A-I/A-II; 1.25%, 5% on B; 5% quarterly repurchase cap; Corbin fee sharing.