CrowdfundedWealth
Reviews · Platform teardown

Rent to Retirement Review: Listing Data, Fees and Who Sells

By Jorge··28 min read

Some links pay us a referral fee; each one says so. Disclosure

Update alert · free

An email when the rent to retirement numbers change

When a rate, rule or filing behind this page changes: what changed, the one number that matters, and the source to check it yourself.

Quick Answer

As of November 12, 2026, Rent to Retirement describes itself two ways: its Disclaimer, Release & Disclosure Statement says it exists “merely to introduce you to opportunities in real estate for a fee” and is not a broker, agent or mortgage broker, while its blog says it buys properties, renovates them and sells them “to investors for a profit”. The 65 listing brochures on its site (56 long-term turnkey, 9 short-term-rental programs) show a median list price of $299,900 for the long-term ones against an FAQ that calls $80,000-$150,000 typical, a median rent of 0.68% of price, and a stated “Potential ROI” of 13% that is 8.1% cash-on-cash when we divide each brochure's own cash flow by its own cash to close (our arithmetic). Its FAQ puts property management “between 8-10% of the gross monthly rent collected”, and 51 of 54 distinct brochures offer a free first year. We found no Colorado real estate license or SEC filing under its names and no court case in the searches we could run (federal dockets were not reachable); the BBB shows 1 complaint in 3 years. Rent to Retirement, Inc. was sold to Calidant Capital in 2026 (Capstone Partners page dated April 14, 2026).

Key Takeaways

  • Seller or introducer? Section 1 of the company's release says R2R “is not acting as a real estate broker or agent” and that its purpose is “merely to introduce you to opportunities in real estate for a fee”; section 2 says the exact seller “is explicitly stated in the purchase agreement”; the site footer says RTR “does not act as a buyer, seller or representative of either party”. Its blog says “we buy properties, renovate them to the same standard as the rentals in our own portfolios, and sell them to investors for a profit”. Read the contract to see who the seller is.
  • The 2026 inventory (56 long-term brochures, 54 distinct): median price $299,900 (range $149,900 to $759,999), one brochure at or below $150,000, median monthly rent 0.68% of price (one brochure at 1% or more), median cash to close 23.4% of price. By state: Tennessee 22, Texas 12, Alabama 10, Florida 6, Georgia 4 (our counts).
  • “Potential ROI” is not cash-on-cash: the median stated ROI is 13%, while each brochure's own cash flow x 12 divided by its own total cash gives a median of 8.1% (range 2.3% to 15.6%), so the stated figure is a median 1.6 times larger (our arithmetic). The listings page does not define the term.
  • Incentives are the price tag: 51 of 54 distinct brochures offer a free or 0% first year of property management (then 8%, 9%, 10% or $109 a month where stated), 36 a rent credit and 35 a closing or post-closing credit. Seven Texas brochures carry post-closing credits of 9.2% to 10.3% of list price ($28,600 to $36,100); the largest outside Texas is 3.2%.
  • Guarantees: six vacant 1960-1983 rehab houses in Alabama and Georgia carry a “Rent Guarantee” “Until Leased”, set $100 below the listed rent; three of the nine short-term-rental brochures say “we guarantee first STR tenant”. The release says no projection or pro forma is “accurate or guaranteed”.
  • On $1,800 rent, the company's own published ranges (8-10% management after a free year, 2-4% vacancy, a half- to full-month leasing fee) cost $2,160 to $3,024 a year without a turnover (10.0% to 14.0% of rent) and $3,060 to $4,824 in a turnover year (our arithmetic); taxes, insurance and repairs are not published.
  • Ownership and record: sold to private-equity firm Calidant Capital with debt and equity from Source Capital's SBIC fund; founded in 2015 on one company page and 2017 on another; BBB A+ with 1 complaint in 3 years and 102 reviews; Trustpilot 2.7 on 4 reviews, unclaimed. Colorado lists a Rent to Retirement, LLC as delinquent since June 1, 2024.

CSV · 146 rows

Rent to Retirement: published terms, legal text, 65 listing brochures, the 2026 sale, regulator and SEC searches, BBB and Trustpilot counts and a worked example

146 rows: the company's fee, closing-cost and vacancy figures, its disclaimer and release, claims that disagree between its pages, one row per listing brochure with price, rent, stated cash flow, cash to close, stated ROI and incentives, our medians, the sale to Calidant Capital, Colorado and SEC search results, BBB and Trustpilot counts and a worked $250,000 example. One source per row.

What Rent to Retirement is, and who owns it

Rent to Retirement (RTR, also “R2R”) calls itself “The Nation's #1 Marketplace for Turnkey Rentals and New Construction Investment Properties” and “A Done-For-You Turnkey Real Estate Investment Company”. Its site sells single-family and small multifamily rentals, mostly new construction or renovated, in a handful of states, with free consultations, an “Academy”, a podcast and a team page listing 14 people. A turnkey rental, in its description, is one that is already built or rehabbed, usually leased and managed by the time you close, so a buyer in another state never has to find a contractor or tenant.

Two facts about ownership are not on its homepage. A Capstone Partners page dated April 14, 2026 is headed “Capstone Partners Advised Rent to Retirement, Inc. on its Sale to Calidant Capital”, naming Calidant Capital, a Texas-based private equity firm, with “funding partner Source Capital”. Source Capital's own page says its SBIC fund “provided debt and equity to support the acquisition of RTR by private equity sponsor Calidant Capital” and describes RTR as connecting investors with turnkey opportunities “from a national network of 50+” builders and rehabbers. Calidant's partnerships page and the M&A advisor IMAP's page both list the deal. Financial terms are not given anywhere we read. For a buyer, the point is simple: the company you talk to is now run for a private-equity owner, and its pricing and incentives are a business decision.

The legal names do not line up neatly. The Capstone page says “Rent to Retirement, Inc.”. The Colorado Secretary of State's open data lists a “Rent to Retirement, LLC” in Denver, formed January 19, 2022, whose status is delinquent (name field: “Rent to Retirement, LLC, Delinquent June 1, 2024”). The BBB lists a limited liability company in Las Vegas with alternate names “R2R, LLC” and “KW Realty” and a start date of January 10, 2017. The company's own pages give two founding years: its blog says it was founded in 2015, its reviews page says its founder formed it in 2017. We do not know which entity signs a purchase contract or collects a fee; the release says the seller is named in the purchase agreement.

Seller, marketplace or introducer: what the company says about itself

The company's own documents describe three different roles. They are not necessarily in conflict, but a reader should know which one the contract uses.

What Rent to Retirement says its role is (company pages, read November 12, 2026)

PageWhat it says
Blog, “Is Rent to Retirement Legit?”“we buy properties, renovate them to the same standard as the rentals in our own portfolios, and sell them to investors for a profit”; new builds come from “discounted deals from developers”
Release, section 1 (“No agency”)“R2R is not acting as a real estate broker or agent, appraiser, contractor, surveyor, title insurer, nor is R2R a mortgage broker” and its purpose is “merely to introduce you to opportunities in real estate for a fee”
Release, section 2“The exact seller of each property is explicitly stated in the purchase agreement”; R2R “may receive compensation from these or other third parties for making Referral”
Release, section 3“R2R does not engage in the sale of any security offering”; projections, pro formas and cash-flow analyses are not “accurate or guaranteed”
Site footer“RTR does not act as a buyer, seller or representative of either party in the transaction”
Referral Partners pageinvites “Builders and Flippers” to “offer your properties to our investors” and says it will pay a partner “per property closing for every property purchased through RTR in perpetuity” (amount not stated)
Source Capital press pagea marketplace sourced from “50+” builders and rehabbers, with “affiliated service providers” for lending, legal, insurance and management

The release is the document a buyer must accept: the listings page asks you to tick “I read and agree to the Disclaimer, Release & Disclosure Statement” before it shows any property, and the release asks the buyer to “release, indemnify, and hold R2R and any of its principals, agents, or employees harmless” from liabilities arising from any referral or investment. That is standard wording for an introducer, and it sits awkwardly beside a blog that says the company is the seller. We cannot tell from public pages whether the company takes title to some houses and only introduces others. Ask in writing, before a deposit, who is the seller on the purchase agreement, what Rent to Retirement is paid on that deal and by whom, and whether the answer is the same for the property manager and lender it introduces.

The FAQ says “There's no additional cost for investing with us beyond what is standard for any standard home purchase” and, about price, “we don't negotiate prices”. Both can be true while the list price carries the company's or builder's margin; the pages do not publish that margin. What they do publish are credits (below), which are the closest thing to a visible price adjustment.

What the 2026 inventory shows

The listings page links 65 brochures (Google Documents), one per property or program. Nine are “RTR STR Rental program” brochures, a short-term-rental pitch discussed below. The other 56 are long-term turnkey rentals; three of them are copies of one San Antonio duplex, leaving 54 distinct. We read all of them on November 12, 2026. Every figure below is the brochure's own, or our arithmetic on the brochure's figures.

The 54 distinct long-term brochures (our counts and medians)

MeasureResultWhat it compares with
StatesTennessee 22, Texas 12, Alabama 10, Florida 6, Georgia 4the FAQ says “multiple different states”; the blog says “over 18 markets”
List pricemedian $299,900; range $149,900 to $759,999FAQ: “$80,000-$150,000 on average for single-family investments”; 1 of 54 is at or below $150,000
Monthly rent as a share of pricemedian 0.68%; range 0.53% to 1.03%; 1 brochure at 1% or morea 1% ratio is a common screening rule among landlords, not a company claim
Cash to close as a share of pricemedian 23.4%; range 14.6% to 27.9%FAQ: 20% down plus about $3,000 closing and up to $2,000 prepaids
Stated monthly cash flowmedian $399.50; range $109 to $776company-stated, “not guaranteed”
Stated “Potential ROI”median 13%; range 7% to 20%not defined on the page
Cash flow x 12 / total cash to closemedian 8.1%; range 2.3% to 15.6%the stated ROI is a median 1.6 times this (range 1.28 to 3.36)
Year built47 built 2022 or later; 7 built 1960-1983 (rehabs priced $149,900 to $234,900)4 of the 10 highest rent-to-price ratios in the set are among these 7 older houses
Rental status28 leased, 22 vacant, 2 fully leased, 2 not statedvacant houses depend on the first lease the manager signs

Two of these comparisons matter most. First, the FAQ still describes a $80,000-$150,000 product. The current inventory is a $300,000 product, where a typical rent of about 0.7% of price leaves little room after a mortgage, taxes, insurance and the fees below. Second, “Potential ROI” is not cash-on-cash. For the first brochure we checked, a $235,000 Memphis house at $1,850 rent, the brochure shows $466 a month of cash flow on $55,000 of total cash: $5,592 a year, or 10.2% on cash, against a stated ROI of 14% (our arithmetic). The company does not say what the extra covers; principal paydown, appreciation or the incentives could account for it, but it is not stated. A buyer comparing 13% to the 8% to 10% a bank pays or a REIT yields would be comparing different things.

Our guide to single-family rental landlords covers who owns these houses and how many have a mortgage; the DSCR loan requirements guide covers how lenders count rent net of management for a loan on a house like these.

The incentives: free management, credits, rate buydowns and a short rent guarantee

Almost every brochure carries a bulleted list of incentives under its title. We counted them across the 54 distinct long-term brochures.

Incentives in the 54 distinct long-term brochures (our counts)

Incentive as wordedBrochuresDetail
“Free PM Year 1” or “0% PM for 1st year”51after year 1 where stated: 8% (13 brochures), 9% (7), 10% (5), $109 a month (10); 16 state no later rate; two brochures say 2 years free
“Rent Credit”36$600 to $1,800; $900 in 16 brochures
“Closing Credit” or “Post Close Credit”35median 2.8% of list price; 7 Texas brochures at 9.2% to 10.3% ($28,600 to $36,100); largest elsewhere 3.2%
“Rate Buydown to 3.75%” (or 5.625% to 5.875%) and similar33the brochures do not name the lender or the cost of the buydown
“Rent Guarantee of $1,625/ mo Until Leased” and similar6all six are vacant 1960-1983 rehabs in Phenix City and Montgomery, Alabama and Columbus, Georgia, set $100 below the listed rent

What to take from this. A free first year of management is a real saving (on $1,800 of rent, 8% is $1,728), but it ends, and the brochures that state the later rate give 8% to 10%, in line with the FAQ's “between 8-10% of the gross monthly rent collected”. Ten brochures name a flat $109 a month from year two, which is 6.1% of an $1,800 rent. A credit of about 10% of list price on seven Texas houses is large enough that the net price is a different number from the list price: on the $323,900 Von Ormy brochure, the “$32,500 Post Closing Credit” is 10.0% of the price. The brochures do not say whether the “total cash” figure is before or after the credit, so a buyer should ask for a closing statement draft, not the brochure, and see which price the lender appraises.

On the rent guarantee: it is six brochures out of 54, it is “Until Leased” (a vacancy bridge, not a rent floor for the life of the lease), and it is $100 under the listed rent. The brochure does not say who pays it, for how long or on what conditions. The release says projections are not guaranteed, so treat each guarantee as a term to get in the contract.

The short-term-rental brochures

Nine brochures are headed “RTR STR Rental program”, with stated returns of 49% to 135%. They publish their own formula: “STR Loophole ROI: $63,505 / $56,875 = 111%” on a $319,900 Kimberly, Alabama house, where $63,505 is annual cash flow ($4,896), plus the closing credit ($23,100), plus a 37% tax saving on 30% of the price ($35,508.90), divided by cash invested. In other words about 56% of that “return” is an estimated tax deduction and 36% is the credit. Each brochure says “ANYONE Can Qualify, No RE PRO Status Required” and “We estimate 30% based on our experience”. Whether any of that deduction is usable depends on the buyer's own tax facts, which is a question for a CPA, not for a brochure. We also found internal mismatches: in four brochures the headline “cash back” (for example “$38K Cash Back” on a Montevallo house) is larger than the “Post-Closing Credit” line in the same document ($24,000), by $1,500 to $14,000.

What one $250,000 turnkey house costs under the company's published numbers (our arithmetic)

Take a house priced at $250,000 that rents for $1,800 a month ($21,600 a year). We use only figures the company publishes in its FAQ, and we do not guess a loan rate, taxes, insurance or repairs, which it does not publish.

Cash to close and annual cost items from the FAQ (our arithmetic)

ItemCompany figureAmount on this house
Down payment (conventional)“required to put down 20% of the purchase price”$50,000
Closing costsabout $3,000 ($1,000 lender, $1,500 title, $500 appraisal)$3,000
Prepaid taxes and insurance“As much as another $2,000”up to $2,000
Cash to closesum of the threeup to $55,000 (22% of price; the brochure median is 23.4%)
Management, year 1“Free PM Year 1” in 51 of 54 brochures$0
Management, year 2 on8-10% of gross rent collected$1,728 to $2,160 a year
Vacancy2-4% (“not guaranteed”)$432 to $864 a year
Management plus vacancy, no turnoverlow 8% + 2%, high 10% + 4%$2,160 to $3,024 (10.0% to 14.0% of rent)
Re-leasing fee, if a tenant leaves½ to a full month's rent$900 to $1,800
Turnover year, management plus vacancy plus leasing feesum$3,060 to $4,824 (14.2% to 22.3% of rent)

On the company's own numbers, a house that rents for $1,800 sends $2,160 to $3,024 of a $21,600 year to management and vacancy in a quiet year, and up to $4,824 in a turnover year, before a dollar of tax, insurance or repair and before the mortgage. That is why the brochures' cash-flow figures depend on assumptions the pages do not show; each brochure points to a “Wealth Tracker” to “Look beyond Year 1”, and we could not open it. The FAQ also says average tenant stays are “3.5-4” years and leasing takes “18 to 21” days; at a four-year stay, one half-month leasing fee every four years is about $225 a year (our arithmetic). Compare this with the general fee data in our property management fees guide, and with a separate seller's record in our Doorvest review and Roofstock review.

If you would finance a house like this with a DSCR loan, line up the lender before the contract: lenders count rent net of the fee.

The regulator, SEC and court record

Rent to Retirement says in its release that “one or more principals of R2R is/are licensed real estate broker”, and its About page says its founder is “a licensed broker” and lists three staff with licenses in Oregon, New Jersey and New York. A broker license is held by a person or company in a given state, so the useful question is: in the state where the house is, who is licensed, and has the state acted against them. We could check Colorado and the SEC; we could not check the rest.

What we searched and found (November 12, 2026)

RegisterResult
Colorado Secretary of State, entity search “rent to retirement”Rent to Retirement, LLC, Denver, entity 20221057844, formed January 19, 2022, status Delinquent (name field “Delinquent June 1, 2024”)
Colorado Division of Real Estate open data (110,313 rows, updated November 11, 2026): company names containing “RENT TO RETIRE”, “R2R” or “KW REALTY”0 rows. Control: “Evernest” returns 1 active “Real Estate Company - Employing” license, so the dataset does list companies
Discipline fields in those datasets (case number, program action)none found for the company
SEC EDGAR full-text search, “Rent to Retirement”, all forms1 hit: a Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. loan-level report (ABS-15G, accession 0001999371-25-012614, filed September 4, 2025) where a due-diligence note says a Rent to Retirement listing did “not reflect date of listing or URL address to confirm open listing” on one loan. It is not a filing by the company
SEC Form D and company-name search (rent to retirement, r2r, rtr capital, rent2retirement)no registrant and no Form D found
CourtListener federal searchnot reachable (HTTP 401); we cannot give a federal case count
Web search for a state attorney general, FTC or court action naming the companynone found; this is a search, not a docket review
Nevada, Oregon, New York, New Jersey, Texas, Tennessee, Georgia, Alabama, Florida real estate regulatorsnot read

What this means and does not. No Colorado real estate company license under the names we searched is not proof that the company is unlicensed: its principals may be licensed in another state, the entity may use another name, and the company says it does not act as a broker. It does mean a buyer cannot confirm a license from the Colorado register and should ask for the license number and state of whoever is paid on the deal, then check that state's lookup. There is no SEC filing under the company's names, which fits its statement that it does not sell securities; the FAQ nevertheless invites investors to be a private lender at “around $100,000” with “double digit returns” (email Invest@RentToRetirement.com), and one homepage testimonial mentions a “Mezz lending deal”. We found no Form D for any such offering. If you are offered a private loan, ask what it is secured by and under which exemption it is made.

The registered-business point also matters for a contract: Colorado lists a delinquent LLC with the company's name while the sale announcement names “Rent to Retirement, Inc.”. Ask which one is on the contract, and see our LLC guide for how an investor holds the house itself.

Complaints and reviews

BBB (profile read November 12, 2026 through a page-reading tool, because the BBB blocks direct requests): rating A+, BBB Accredited since June 17, 2021, a limited liability company in Las Vegas (BBB of Southern Nevada) with alternate names “R2R, LLC” and “KW Realty”. 1 complaint in the last 3 years (Service or Repair Issues, resolved, dated June 30, 2025) and 0 in the last 12 months, with 102 customer reviews averaging 4.85 of 5. The profile shows no alerts. Trustpilot (context only): a TrustScore of 2.7 on 4 reviews, 75% one-star and 25% two-star, 3 in the last 12 months, on an unclaimed profile.

How Rent to Retirement describes its reviews

Company pageClaimWhat we read
Blog table“A+ Rated, 60+ 5-Star Reviews” on the BBBBBB profile: 102 customer reviews, 4.85 average, one 1-star visible on page 1
Blog tableBiggerPockets “270+ 5 Star Reviews”reviews page says “BiggerPockets (320+ Reviews!)” and shows the BBB at 4.92/5 “as of April 2026” (BBB profile on November 12: 4.85)
Blog“more than 5,000 investors over the past decade”; “founded in 2015”reviews page: “formed Rent To Retirement in 2017”; FAQ: “50 plus properties a month”
Reviews page“five-star rating” and “average of five stars”Trustpilot 2.7 on 4 reviews (not claimed by the company)

A company-curated review list is not an independent measure, and a BBB profile with one complaint in three years is a good sign by that measure alone. The BBB does not tell you how many deals closed. We did not score review sites; forum posts on BiggerPockets and elsewhere describe both good and bad experiences with turnkey sellers in general, and we did not verify any of them. A turnkey buyer's real exposure is usually the third party the seller introduces: the builder, the manager and the lender. The company's sponsor page lists Mynd as a Bronze Sponsor with an offer of “1 month of Mynd PM services + 12 months of Stessa Pro for free”; we covered that manager's record in our Mynd Property Management review. Check each third party yourself.

What a reader can do with this

  1. Ask who the seller is. The release says it is named in the purchase agreement. Get a draft contract before a deposit and read the seller's name, the title company and any assignment clause.
  2. Ask what Rent to Retirement is paid on your deal and by whom. The release says it “may receive compensation” from third parties and the Referral Partners page says it pays referrers per closing. Ask whether any of its pay depends on the lender, builder or manager you choose.
  3. Compare net price, not list price. If a brochure has a $20,000-plus credit, ask the lender what price the appraisal and the loan use, and whether “total cash” includes the credit.
  4. Run your own cash flow. Use the company's 8-10% management range and 2-4% vacancy, add your own taxes, insurance and repairs, and treat “Potential ROI” as a marketing figure until the page defines it. At $1,800 of rent the first two alone cost $2,160 to $3,024 a year after year 1 (our arithmetic).
  5. Put any rent guarantee in the contract. Who pays it, how long, and what ends it.
  6. Check licenses where the house is. Ask for the license number and state of the broker or company paid on the deal and look it up on that state's regulator site.
  7. Treat short-term-rental tax claims as questions for your CPA. The brochures' 37% tax-saving line is an estimate on their own 30% assumption.
  8. If you finance it, line up the loan first. Lenders count rent net of the management fee; our DSCR loan guide lists what a lender asks for.

This is analysis of public documents, not investment, legal or tax advice.

FAQ

This is analysis of public documents, not investment, legal or tax advice. Sources: renttoretirement.com home page, FAQ, About, Sponsors, Referral Partners, Turnkey Properties page, Disclaimer, Release & Disclosure Statement and blog post “Is Rent to Retirement Legit?”, landing.renttoretirement.com reviews page (ratings “as of April 2026”) and the 65 listing brochures linked from the listings page (the company's own claims, read November 12, 2026); Source Capital press page “Source Capital Invests in Rent to Retirement”, Calidant Capital partnerships page, IMAP transaction page and Capstone Partners transaction page dated April 14, 2026; Colorado Secretary of State business entity open data (dataset 4ykn-tg5h), Colorado Division of Real Estate “Licensed Real Estate Professionals in Colorado” (4zse-6bnw, updated November 11, 2026) and Division of Professions and Occupations licenses (7s5z-vewr), queried November 12, 2026; SEC EDGAR full-text and company-name search and accession 0001999371-25-012614 (exhibit ex99-3sch1.htm); BBB profile, complaints and customer-review pages and the Trustpilot page, read through a page-reading tool on November 12, 2026. CourtListener (HTTP 401), other state regulators, attorney general files, the company's purchase contracts and management agreements and its “Wealth Tracker” were not read. Worked examples and medians are our arithmetic.

Affiliate Disclosure: Some links are affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This does not affect our ratings. Learn more.