Ark7 vs Fundrise (2026): What the SEC Filings Say, Not the Blogs
Some links pay us a referral fee; each one says so. Disclosure
Quick Answer
Ark7 vs Fundrise, from the filings (as of October 20, 2026): the two are different products, and the comparison pages that rank for this search, led by Ark7's own post dated August 5, 2026, get several facts about both wrong or out of date. Ark7 sells shares of single named houses through three Regulation A issuers. Its October 13, 2026 offering circular sets an asset management fee of 15% of free cash flow available for distribution (plus a sourcing fee of no more than 3% of the maximum offering), says “There is currently no public trading market for any Series Interests,” and allows a transfer only after 12 months and with the manager's written consent. The Ark7 post says “Zero ongoing AUM fees” and sends readers to a “PPEX ATS” resale market; the three Ark7 filings we saved do not mention PPEX. Fundrise's Flagship Real Estate Interval Fund is an SEC-registered fund with a $1,000 minimum (not the $10 the post gives), total annual fund operating expenses of 1.78% (0.85% management fee; we found no 0.15% advisory fee in the prospectus), and a quarterly repurchase offer of at least 5% of shares at NAV. Results, six months to June 30, 2026: Ark7's three issuers reported combined revenue of $862,183, a net loss of $472,004 and distributions of $540,390; the Flagship fund reported $1,232,657 thousand of net assets, a 6.03% NAV return (not annualized) and $169,265 thousand of repurchases. On fees alone Ark7 can come out cheaper in a five-year example (our arithmetic), but the two cannot be compared on fees alone. This is analysis of public documents, not investment, legal or tax advice.
Key Takeaways
- Ark7's comparison post (August 5, 2026) says “Zero ongoing AUM fees (only a 3% one-time sourcing fee).” The October 13, 2026 circular of Ark7 Properties LLC says the asset manager is paid 15% of any free cash flow available for distribution, so there is an ongoing fee; it is just not charged on the balance.
- The same post says to “Sell shares after a 1-year holding period on the PPEX ATS trading platform.” The circular says there is no public trading market for any series and that a transfer needs a 12-month hold plus the managing member's written consent. PPEX appears in none of the three Ark7 filings we saved.
- Fundrise Flagship Real Estate Interval Fund: $1,000 minimum, 1.78% total annual fund operating expenses (0.85% management fee, 0.50% marketing), no repurchase fee today (up to 2.00% allowed), no secondary market expected. The post gives a $10 minimum and a 0.15% advisory fee that this prospectus does not show.
- Five years on $10,000 (our arithmetic, flat balances): Fundrise Flagship about $890 at 1.78% a year; Ark7 $300 sourcing fee plus 15% of distributable cash flow, from $300 (no cash flow) to $825 ($700 a year). Ark7 stays cheaper until distributable cash flow passes about $787 a year per $10,000, but its fee sits on top of property-level costs and the two products carry different risks.
- Six months to June 30, 2026, Ark7's three issuers: revenue $862,183, net loss $472,004, distributions $540,390, and $6,890,838 receivable from Ark7 Inc. (24% of $28,731,246 of total assets, our arithmetic). Fundrise Flagship: NAV $12.52 a share, up 6.03% in the half, with $169,265 thousand repurchased against $106,343 thousand of new share sales.
CSV · 66 rows
The data table in this article, as CSV
Ark7's three Regulation A issuers against the Fundrise Flagship Real Estate Interval Fund: fees, liquidity terms, six-month results and a worked five-year fee example, each row with its SEC accession.
People who search “ark7 vs fundrise” mostly land on comparison posts written by one of the two platforms or by sites that repeat them. Ark7's own post is dated August 5, 2026 and its pitch is that Ark7 has no annual fee and a resale market, while Fundrise has queues and penalties. We read the filings behind both sides instead. Ark7 is a set of single-house offerings; the Fundrise product that most readers mean is the Flagship fund. For each product on its own, see our Ark7 review and Fundrise Flagship review; for Ark7 against the other house-by-house platform, see Arrived Homes vs Ark7.
What the Comparison Post Says, and What the Filing Says
Ark7's post is a marketing page, and it is entitled to say what it likes about its own product. The problem is where it can be checked against a filing. Here are its claims next to the documents.
| Claim on the Ark7 post (August 5, 2026) | What the filing says | Source |
|---|---|---|
| “Zero ongoing AUM fees (only a 3% one-time sourcing fee)” | Asset manager paid “15% of any Free Cash Flows available for distribution”; sourcing fee “No greater than 3% of the maximum offering size.” There is no fee on the balance, but there is an ongoing fee on cash flow. The earlier Ark7 Properties LLC Form 1-SA still says 10%; the Plus and Advance 1-SAs say 15%. | Ark7 Properties LLC circular, October 13, 2026; Forms 1-SA, June 30, 2026 |
| Sell on the “PPEX ATS trading platform” after a one-year hold | “There is currently no public trading market for any Series Interests.” A transfer needs a 12-month hold and the managing member's written consent. We searched the saved circular and the three 1-SAs: none mentions PPEX or an alternative trading system. | Ark7 Properties LLC circular, October 13, 2026 |
| Fundrise: “$10 minimum investment for fund shares” | For the Flagship Real Estate Interval Fund: “The minimum initial investment for Shares of the Fund is $1,000.” | Fundrise Flagship prospectus, May 1, 2026 |
| Fundrise: “1% total annual fees (0.85% management + 0.15% advisory)” | Fee table: management fee 0.85%, other expenses 0.74% (marketing 0.50%), interest on borrowings 0.19%, total annual fund operating expenses 1.78%. No advisory-fee line; the one place “advisory fee” appears in the prospectus text is a table note about the portfolio managers' other accounts. | Fundrise Flagship prospectus, May 1, 2026 |
| Fundrise: “quarterly redemption queues with penalties” | The fund “does not currently charge a repurchase fee” and may in future charge up to 2.00%. It offers to repurchase at least 5% of shares each quarter at NAV; the August 28, 2026 offer was for up to 5%. | Fundrise Flagship prospectus; Form N-23c-3, August 28, 2026 |
The first two rows matter most to a buyer. The fee is real but is not a percentage of your balance, and the resale route the post describes is not in the offering documents. Our other pages reached the same conclusion on the resale point; see real estate crowdfunding liquidity in 2026.
Fees: A Five-Year Example With the Filing Terms
The two fee systems are built differently. Fundrise Flagship charges a percentage of net assets every year whether or not the fund earns anything. Ark7 charges a sourcing fee of up to 3% of the maximum offering (for example, $21,493.35 on the $716,445.00 maximum offering of Series #KYLBE, at $91.50 a share) and then 15% of free cash flow available for distribution, paid only when a distribution is made. The table below holds each at its filed terms on $10,000 for five years. It is an illustration with assumed cash flows, not a forecast.
| Scenario on $10,000 over five years (our arithmetic) | Ark7 fees | Fundrise Flagship fees |
|---|---|---|
| Series produces no distributable cash flow | $300 (3% sourcing fee only) | $890 (1.78% x $10,000 x 5, flat balance) |
| Distributable cash flow $300 a year | $525 ($300 + 15% x $300 x 5) | $890 |
| Distributable cash flow $500 a year | $675 | $890 |
| Distributable cash flow $700 a year | $825 | $890 |
| Break-even | About $787 a year of distributable cash flow per $10,000 | (890 - 300) / (0.15 x 5) |
Three limits on that table. First, Ark7's 15% is charged on free cash flow, which comes after the series' operating expenses; the circular lists “Management fees, audit expenses, and report preparation costs for the series property” among them without giving a rate, and the post quotes 8% to 15% of rent that we could not find in the filings we saved. Second, Fundrise's 1.78% does not include property-level costs because the properties sit inside joint ventures the fund owns; the prospectus fee table shows “Property Level Expense” as “None.” Third, the Ark7 sourcing fee is based on the maximum offering, so it is a cost only to the extent the series sells out. On pure fee arithmetic Ark7's post is right that its structure can be cheaper. It is not right that there is no ongoing fee.
Liquidity: Neither Product Is a Savings Account
Ark7: no public trading market for any series interest, a 12-month minimum hold and the managing member's written consent for any transfer. The circular describes the offering as made directly by associated persons of the managing member under the Rule 3a4-1 safe harbor, with no commission. The practical exit is the sale of the house.
Fundrise Flagship: a closed-end interval fund with “no secondary market” expected, so the exit is the quarterly repurchase offer: at least 5% of shares at NAV, and the prospectus says it is “likely that the Fund may offer to repurchase only the minimum allowable amount of 5% of outstanding shares.” Requests above the offer are pro-rated. The August 28, 2026 offer was for up to 5% with a request deadline of September 30, 2026. In the six months to June 30, 2026 the fund repurchased $169,265 thousand of shares, 13.7% of its period-end net assets (our arithmetic), against $106,343 thousand of share sales. Both products can leave you waiting; the difference is that one has a published schedule and the other has a sale date nobody has set.
What the Money Looks Like: Results to June 30, 2026
| Six months to June 30, 2026 | Ark7 (three issuers combined) | Fundrise Flagship |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue or net assets | Revenue $862,183 (Ark7 Properties LLC $414,019; Plus $249,550; Advance $198,614) | Net assets $1,232,657 thousand; 98,450,123 shares; total liabilities $53,335 thousand |
| Result | Net loss $472,004 (Ark7 Properties LLC $323,959; Plus $64,389; Advance $83,656), about 55% of revenue (our arithmetic) | NAV $11.82 to $12.52 a share; total return on NAV 6.03%, not annualized |
| Cash paid out | Distributions $540,390 (about 63% of revenue, our arithmetic) | Distributions $1,230 thousand, all return of capital |
| Related-party exposure | $6,890,838 receivable from Ark7 Inc., 24% of total assets of $28,731,246 (our arithmetic) | Not applicable to this comparison |
| Tax form basis | Each series elected to be taxed as a C corporation | Fund taxed as a REIT; distributions expected quarterly |
| Audit status of figures | Unaudited (Forms 1-SA) | Unaudited (Form N-CSRS) |
Ark7's issuers lost money in the half and still paid out more than half of revenue, which the circular's risk factors flag: its going-concern note says the statements “indicate there may be substantial doubt about the company's ability to continue as a going concern.” Fundrise Flagship's six-month gain came from valuation changes, not from distributions; its distributions were a return of capital. Our Fundrise Flagship review breaks down where that gain came from, and our Ark7 review covers the audited 2025 figures.
What a Reader Can Do With This
- Check any “vs” page against the offering document. Ask for the circular (Ark7) or the prospectus fee table (Fundrise) and read the fee and transfer paragraphs yourself; the links are in the sources line below.
- Decide what you want to be exposed to. One named house (Ark7) concentrates risk in a single property and a small sponsor; a pooled fund (Fundrise) spreads it across joint ventures that Fundrise itself values.
- Plan the exit before the entry. Neither document gives a way to sell on demand. Money you may need within a few years is the money to keep out of both.
- Read the tax paragraph. Ark7 series pay dividends from C corporations; Fundrise Flagship distributions come from a REIT and were all return of capital in the half. Neither is simple rent income.
- Treat our table as a template. If you compare other platforms, put each fee claim next to the sentence in the filing and see whether they match.
For a wider list of choices, see Fundrise alternatives and fractional real estate investing in 2026.
Update alert · free
An email when the fractional real estate platforms numbers change
When a rate, rule or filing behind this page changes: what changed, the one number that matters, and the source to check it yourself.
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Sources: Ark7 Properties LLC (SEC CIK 1815395) Form 1-A POS offering circular dated October 13, 2026 (accession 0001815395-26-000006) and Form 1-SA for the six months to June 30, 2026 (0001815395-26-000005); Ark7 Properties Plus LLC (CIK 1923734) Form 1-SA (0001923734-26-000002); Ark7 Properties Advance LLC (CIK 2025051) Form 1-SA (0002025051-26-000006); Fundrise Real Estate Interval Fund, LLC (CIK 1777677) Form 486BPOS prospectus dated May 1, 2026 (0001213900-26-049518), Form N-CSRS for the six months to June 30, 2026 (0001777677-26-000057) and Form N-23c-3 repurchase notice dated August 28, 2026 (0001213900-26-094717); Ark7, “Ark7 vs Fundrise,” blog post dated August 5, 2026 (ark7.com), read October 20, 2026. Worked examples are our arithmetic and assume the stated cash flows and flat balances. We have no affiliate relationship with either platform. This is analysis of public documents, not investment, legal or tax advice.
Keep reading.
- 0117 min read
CFBank Mortgage Reviews 2026: Loans, Complaints, OCC Rating
CFBank mortgage reviews checked against records: 187 HMDA loans in 2025 vs 6,332 in 2020, no CFPB complaint found, and an OCC rating of Needs to Improve.
- 0225 min read
Moonfare Review 2026: Is It Legit? What SEC and FINRA Filings Show
Moonfare read from its own SEC and FINRA records as of October 17, 2026: the adviser (Moonfare GmbH) is an exempt reporting adviser with 27 funds and $392.1 million of gross assets, the US broker-dealer (Moonfare Securities USA) is SEC-registered with no disclosures, and 36 feeder funds on EDGAR report $626.1 million sold. Fees, custody, minimums, lockups and the gaps we found.
- 0325 min read
VineBrook Homes Trust Review 2026: NAV $52.68, Home Sales and Debt
VineBrook Homes Trust (SEC CIK 1755755) is a non-traded single-family rental REIT advised by a NexPoint affiliate. From its filings: NAV $52.68 against a $63.04 peak, 21,560 homes against 27,211, $2.66 billion of debt with $1.05 billion due in 2027, a property manager swapped in 2025, two annual meetings cancelled for lack of quorum, and repurchases suspended since July 2025.