Invitation Homes FTC Refunds and INVH vs AMH Stock (2026)
Some links pay us a referral fee; each one says so. Disclosure
Quick Answer
Invitation Homes FTC refunds, as of October 13, 2026: on March 11, 2026 the Federal Trade Commission announced it was sending 444,131 checks totaling more than $47.2 million to people who paid Invitation Homes $45 or more in covered fees or charges between January 2021 and September 2024 and had not already received a credit or refund from the company. The FTC's refund page describes checks sent to eligible people, not a claim form, and says to cash them “within 90 days, as indicated on the check”; counted from the announcement that is June 9, 2026 (our arithmetic), so for checks sent in March the window has most likely closed. The refund administrator is Rust Consulting, 800-804-6915. The money comes from a $48,000,000 judgment in FTC v. Invitation Homes Inc., No. 1:24-cv-04280-SEG (N.D. Ga.), entered September 27, 2024; the company says it admitted no liability. As stocks, at June 30, 2026: Invitation Homes (NYSE: INVH) wholly owned 85,509 homes and American Homes 4 Rent (NYSE: AMH) held 61,183; second-quarter same-store NOI grew 1.5% at INVH and 2.7% at AMH (our arithmetic); quarterly dividends are $0.30 and $0.33; INVH has $1.39 billion of secured debt, including a $987.9 million loan with 0.9 years to maturity, while AMH's debt table shows nothing due in 2026 or 2027.
Key Takeaways
- The FTC's refund page (March 2026) lists 444,131 checks totaling more than $47.2 million for people who paid Invitation Homes $45 or more in covered fees or charges from January 2021 to September 2024. It says nothing about a claim form; people who already got a credit or refund from the company are excluded. Average check: about $106 (our arithmetic, on a rounded total).
- The source of the money is a $48,000,000 judgment in the stipulated order entered September 27, 2024 (Case 1:24-cv-04280-SEG, Northern District of Georgia). Invitation Homes told the SEC it funded the $48.0 million with no civil penalties and without admission of liability; with the separate City of San Diego settlement (about $20.0 million) its 10-K reports $68.0 million of aggregate monetary relief.
- As a landlord, Invitation Homes is larger (85,509 wholly owned homes, plus 8,069 in joint ventures and 15,639 managed for others, against AMH's 61,183 plus 3,961 in joint ventures) but is growing more slowly: same-store NOI rose 1.5% in the second quarter of 2026 and 0.7% in the first half, against 2.7% and 3.3% at AMH (our arithmetic; the companies define the measure differently).
- Balance sheets differ in kind. Invitation Homes carries $8.59 billion of debt, 16.2% of it secured (our arithmetic), and says it expects to refinance a significant portion of its secured debt maturing in 2027 with unsecured debt. AMH carries $5.19 billion, all of it unsecured notes and a revolving facility in the table, with the first maturity in February 2028.
- Both are buying back shares: Invitation Homes repurchased 20,579,736 shares for $539.2 million in the first half of 2026 (share count down 3.1% from February 18 to July 29, our arithmetic); AMH repurchased about 7.8 million Class A shares for about $238.1 million (our sum of January and the 2026 program).
- Neither company's latest 10-Q reports material litigation. Invitation Homes' Legal Proceedings item says it is not subject to any material litigation other than routine matters; AMH's note refers to proceedings “incidental to our business”. The FTC matter now appears in Invitation Homes' filings only as a resolved 2024 item in the risk factors.
CSV · 138 rows
Invitation Homes and American Homes 4 Rent from SEC filings and the FTC order, 2026: refund facts, homes, same-store NOI, debt, dividends, buybacks
138 rows: the FTC refund facts, the complaint and the $48,000,000 order in FTC v. Invitation Homes Inc., and the Invitation Homes and American Homes 4 Rent figures from their FY2025 10-K, June 30, 2026 10-Q and proxy statements. One SEC accession or official URL per row.
Invitation Homes FTC refunds: what the FTC says, line by line
The FTC publishes the refund facts on three official pages: a refund page dated March 2026, a press release of March 11, 2026, and the case page for matter 202 3170. We saved all three, plus the complaint and the court order, and read them on October 13, 2026.
| Question | What the FTC pages say | Where |
|---|---|---|
| How many checks, how much? | 444,131 checks totaling more than $47.2 million | Refund page; press release, March 11, 2026 |
| Who is eligible? | People who paid Invitation Homes $45 or more for covered fees or charges between January 2021 and September 2024 | Press release |
| Who is not? | People who already got a credit or refund from Invitation Homes | Refund page; press release |
| Is there a claim form? | None is described. The page says “If you got a check, please cash it within 90 days.” | Refund page (copy of July 16, 2026, and a live read on October 13, 2026) |
| How long to cash it? | 90 days, as indicated on the check; from March 11, 2026 that is June 9, 2026 (our arithmetic) | Press release |
| Who answers questions? | Rust Consulting, Inc., 800-804-6915, info@InvitationHomesRefund.com | Press release |
| Scam warning | “The Commission never requires people to pay money or provide account information to get a payment.” | Press release |
| Average check | About $106 (our arithmetic: $47.2 million divided by 444,131; the FTC gives no per-check amounts) | Our arithmetic |
Sources: FTC refund page “Invitation Homes Settlement” (March 2026), FTC press release of March 11, 2026, FTC case page for Invitation Homes Inc., FTC v. (matter 202 3170).
Three things the FTC pages do not say, so we cannot: the date each check was mailed (the 90 days are counted from the date printed on the check, and the press release is only the announcement), what the roughly $0.8 million between the $48 million paid and the $47.2 million in checks covers (our arithmetic; the order lets the FTC use the money for “any attendant expenses for the administration of any redress fund”), and whether a person who did not receive a check can still get one. For that last question the FTC names the administrator, Rust Consulting, as the contact.
The order also says where unspent money goes: “Any money not used for relief is to be deposited to the U.S. Treasury.” Before that, if direct redress is impracticable or money remains, the FTC may use it for related relief it considers reasonably related to the practices in the complaint.
The case in dates
| Date | Event | Source |
|---|---|---|
| August 2021 | The FTC began investigating certain Invitation Homes business practices, per the company | Invitation Homes 10-Q for September 30, 2024 |
| September 24, 2024 | Complaint filed in the Northern District of Georgia, Case 1:24-cv-04280-SEG, with a proposed stipulated order | Complaint, Document 1 |
| September 27, 2024 | Judge signs the stipulated order; $48,000,000 judgment; payment due within 7 days | Order, Document 21 |
| Third quarter 2024 | Invitation Homes funds $48.0 million to escrow, “with no civil penalties” | Invitation Homes 10-Q for September 30, 2024 |
| October 2024 | Escrow released to the FTC | Invitation Homes 10-Q for September 30, 2024 |
| December 8, 2025 | FTC Bureau of Consumer Protection sends a letter to rental property managers on advertising the total monthly rent; it cites the Invitation Homes action | FTC letter, footnote 1 |
| March 11, 2026 | FTC announces 444,131 checks totaling more than $47.2 million | FTC press release |
| March 20, 2026 | FTC case page still shows Case Status “Pending” | Case page (Internet Archive copy) |
The case page is the official page that gives the court number, and it shows Case Status “Pending” although the order is entered and the money paid. The order has a section on retention of jurisdiction and compliance duties that run for years (it requires delivery of the order to personnel and compliance submissions for 10 years after entry), so we do not read “Pending” as an open dispute (our reading).
What the FTC alleged, and what the order requires
None of this was proved at trial; the order resolved the complaint by agreement and Invitation Homes told its investors that it did so “without any admission of liability”. The complaint's allegations, in its words:
- Hidden monthly charges. “Since 2019, people have paid more than $18 million in application fees for listings that were deceptively priced by Invitation Homes”, with application fees up to $55 and holding fees up to $500, and rent that “could be as much as $1,740 higher per year” once mandatory fees were added.
- Security deposits. Between 2020 and 2022 the company “returned only 39.2% of consumers' total security deposit dollars collected, compared to the national average of 63.9%”; nearly 48,000 residents had an average of $1,205 withheld.
- Eviction practices. The order's findings summarize the complaint as charging, among other things, “steering residents away from eviction protections during the COVID-19 pandemic”.
What the order requires going forward includes a definition of “Total Monthly Leasing Price” that covers “all recurring mandatory fees or recurring mandatory charges associated with the Property”, a ban on misrepresenting the price or whether a fee is optional, and a rule that deposit money may be withheld only for damage “beyond normal wear and tear”, in the actual amount of the damage, and only if used to repair it. The order binds Invitation Homes for properties it owns or manages. It is not a ruling about any other landlord, including AMH.
Invitation Homes reviews: what the public record can and cannot tell you
People searching for Invitation Homes “reviews” are usually asking whether a lease with the company is a good idea. Resident reviews are opinions and we do not rate them. The public record offers three kinds of fact instead: what a federal agency alleged and the company agreed to (above), what the company says about its screening and rents in its 10-K (see our landlord census for the screening policy), and the company's own numbers on how often residents leave. In the second quarter of 2026 its same-store annualized turnover was 22.8%, against 24.6% a year earlier; AMH's same-home turnover was 8.1% in the quarter against 7.5% (not annualized, so the two numbers are not comparable). Invitation Homes also manages 15,639 homes it does not own, so a house marketed under its name may belong to someone else.
INVH vs AMH: the two listed single-family rental REITs, side by side
Everything below is from each company's latest 10-Q (June 30, 2026) and FY2025 10-K unless noted. The two define their measures differently (Invitation Homes “Same Store”, AMH “Same-Home Core”), so compare directions, not decimals. Neither company had filed a third-quarter 10-Q as of October 13, 2026.
| Measure | Invitation Homes (INVH) | American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) |
|---|---|---|
| Homes at June 30, 2026 | 85,509 wholly owned (86,192 at December 31, 2025) | 61,183 held, including 701 held for sale (61,479 at December 31, 2025) |
| Also | 8,069 in joint ventures; 15,639 managed for third parties | 3,961 in unconsolidated joint ventures (J.P. Morgan JV I and II, AMH owns 20%) |
| Occupancy, Q2 2026 | 95.9% average (Same Store 97.1%) | 95.6% of days occupied (Same-Home 96.0%, from 96.4%) |
| Rent | $2,460 average monthly rent; renewals +3.2%, new leases +1.1% | $2,353 average monthly realized rent; blended change in rent +2.7% |
| Same-store NOI, Q2 2026 | $393.1 million, up 1.5% (our arithmetic) | $245.8 million, up 2.7% (our arithmetic) |
| Same-store NOI, first half 2026 | $783.5 million, up 0.7% (our arithmetic) | $490.9 million, up 3.3% (our arithmetic) |
| Same-store NOI, FY2025 | $1,540.8 million, up 2.3% (our arithmetic) | $932.2 million, up 4.7% (our arithmetic) |
| Core FFO, Q2 2026 | $301.2 million ($0.51 per diluted share, from $0.48) | $202.8 million, from $198.0 million (no per-share figure in the 10-Q) |
| Net income, Q2 2026 | $219.7 million, of which $132.3 million is gain on sale of property | $132.9 million, of which $59.4 million is gain on sale and impairment, net |
| Homes bought and sold, first half 2026 | 457 acquired, 1,140 sold | 999 new homes delivered to the portfolio, 854 identified for sale; $403.1 million net disposition proceeds |
| Dividend declared, Q2 2026 | $0.30 per share (Q2 2025: $0.29) | $0.33 per Class A share (Q2 2025: $0.30) |
Sources: Invitation Homes Form 10-Q (0001687229-26-000045) and Form 10-K (0001687229-26-000016); American Homes 4 Rent Form 10-Q (0001562401-26-000047) and Form 10-K (0001562401-26-000010). Growth rates are our arithmetic from the dollar figures the filings print.
Two readings of the table (ours). First, growth has slowed at both from 2025, and by more at Invitation Homes: its same-store NOI growth went from 2.3% for 2025 to 1.5% in the second quarter, AMH's from 4.7% to 2.7%. Invitation Homes also reports that new leases in the first half of 2026 averaged (1.2)% against 0.9% a year earlier, while renewals stayed positive: the company is holding rent on residents who stay and cutting it to fill vacant homes. Second, net income is not the cleaner yardstick in 2026 because property sales lift it: about 60% of Invitation Homes' second-quarter net income and about 45% of AMH's was gain on sales (our arithmetic), which is why we show core FFO and NOI.
AMH's shape is different. It keeps building: its Development Program delivered 999 homes to the operating portfolio in the first half of 2026 while it marked 854 for sale. Invitation Homes bought the homebuilder ResiBuilt on January 14, 2026, described in the 10-Q as “a leading fee homebuilder specializing in single-family rental communities”, and reported homebuilding revenues of $93.2 million in the first half. Its 10-Q says uncertainty over the federal ROAD to Housing Act “has also caused prospective institutional purchasers to defer or curtail acquisition activity, reducing demand for build-to-rent communities and fee-build operations”, so that business sells to other investors, not only to Invitation Homes.
Debt: what is due, and who is secured
| Debt, June 30, 2026 | Invitation Homes | American Homes 4 Rent |
|---|---|---|
| Total debt (gross) | $8,593.2 million at a weighted average 3.92%, 4.4 years to maturity | $5,190.0 million (December 31, 2025: $5,160.0 million) |
| Net debt | $8,400.4 million | Not stated in the 10-Q table |
| Secured debt | $1,388.2 million, 16.2% of the total (our arithmetic), at 4.04% | None in the debt table: unsecured senior notes and a revolving credit facility |
| Largest near-term item | IH 2017-1 secured loan, $987.9 million at 4.23%, 0.9 years to maturity | 2028 senior notes, $500.0 million at 4.08%, due February 15, 2028 |
| Maturities 2026 and 2027 | Company plans to “refinance a significant portion of our secured debt maturing in 2027 with unsecured debt” | None: remaining 2026 and 2027 show no maturities |
| After quarter end | $500 million of 4.950% senior notes due 2032 (underwriting agreement June 30, 2026; issued July 8, 2026 per the 10-Q) | Revolving credit facility drawn $390.0 million at 4.53%, matures July 16, 2029 |
Sources: Invitation Homes 10-Q “Long-Term Debt Strategy” table and Form 8-K filed July 6, 2026 (0001193125-26-296211); AMH 10-Q Note 8 and debt maturity table.
Our reading: the near-term refinancing question is an Invitation Homes question, and the company has already started answering it with unsecured notes. AMH's table has no maturity until 2028. Neither fact says anything about price or about whether the refinancing will cost more or less than the loans it replaces; that depends on rates at the time.
Dividends, buybacks and share count
| Item | Invitation Homes | American Homes 4 Rent |
|---|---|---|
| Quarterly dividend declared in 2026 | $0.30 per share (declared June 11, 2026, paid July 17, 2026) | $0.33 per Class A share in each of the first two quarters |
| Same quarter, 2025 | $0.29 | $0.30 |
| Run-rate if unchanged (our arithmetic: quarterly rate times four) | $1.20 a year | $1.32 a year |
| Shares repurchased, first half 2026 | 20,579,736 shares for $539.2 million | About 3.7 million shares for $115.1 million in January (average $31.49) plus about 4.1 million for $123.0 million under the 2026 program (average $29.88) |
| Authorization left, June 30, 2026 | $400.0 million | $377.0 million of Class A shares, plus up to $250.0 million of preferred shares |
| Shares outstanding | 609,386,093 on February 18, 2026; 590,623,226 on July 29, 2026 (down 3.1%, our arithmetic) | 363,141,211 Class A on February 18, 2026; 359,179,944 on July 29, 2026 (down 1.1%, our arithmetic) |
Sources: Invitation Homes 10-Q (equity statement, Note 9, Part II Item 2) and 10-K cover; AMH 10-Q (equity statement, Note 10) and 10-K cover. The average prices are what each company reports paying for its own shares, not a market quote; we do not publish live prices or targets.
A reader looking for “INVH stock” or “AMH stock” will find the quote anywhere; what a quote page does not show is that both companies shrank their share counts in 2026 while their home counts barely moved, and that Invitation Homes spent $539.2 million to do it against $393.1 million of same-store NOI in a single quarter. These are facts about the filings, not a view on either stock.
Litigation and regulatory items each company discloses
- Invitation Homes. Item 3 of the 10-K and Part II, Item 1 of the 10-Q both say: “We are not subject to any material litigation nor, to management’s knowledge, is any material litigation currently threatened against us other than routine litigation and administrative proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business.” The FTC matter appears in the risk factors of the 2025 10-K as resolved: “Both matters were resolved without any admission of liability, resulting in aggregate monetary relief of $68.0 million.” The $68.0 million is the FTC's $48.0 million plus the City of San Diego settlement, which the 2024 10-K puts at $20.0 million disbursed to plaintiffs in October 2024 (our arithmetic; the third-quarter 2024 10-Q shows $48,000 thousand and $19,993 thousand funded to escrow). The FTC's own case page still lists the matter as “Pending”.
- American Homes 4 Rent. Item 3 of the 10-K sends the reader to Note 14, and the note says “We are involved in various legal and administrative proceedings that are incidental to our business.” We found no named government action in the 10-K or the second-quarter 10-Q. Its risk factors say generally that government investigations “may result in significant costs and expenses”.
- Both. The ROAD to Housing Act, enacted July 11, 2026 and effective January 7, 2027, is the live regulatory item. AMH says it “will adversely impact our ability” to buy homes through the MLS, though it has not been buying significantly that way. Our census of single-family landlords has the statute's text and its size threshold.
Who holds the shares, and how concentrated the landlords are
The two listed companies own 146,692 homes outright between them (our sum of 85,509 and 61,183; AMH's figure includes 701 held for sale). We did not find a figure for how many single-family rentals exist in the US in either 10-K, so we cannot state their share of the market from these filings. Our census puts them next to Progress Residential, Tricon and the others.
The 2026 proxy statements list the holders of more than 5%. For Invitation Homes: The Vanguard Group 16.11%, BlackRock 10.39%, Cohen & Steers 9.59%, Norges Bank 8.82% and State Street 6.43%. For AMH: The Vanguard Group 12.16%, BlackRock 11.99% and Norges Bank 6.35%, plus HF Investments 2010, LLC, which the proxy describes as made up of trusts for heirs of its founder. The footnotes show how old these are: the Vanguard and BlackRock positions are taken from Schedule 13G/A filings dated February 2024 to February 2025, so treat the percentages as the proxy's, not as today's. AMH also reports that affiliates owned about 7.9% of its Class A shares at June 30, 2026, and about 19.0% counting units and Class B shares. Listed shares are the mainstream route to this asset; non-traded and small-ticket routes, including VineBrook and Arrived, work differently, and our property management fees page shows what both REITs report as the cost of managing their own homes. For funds that hold these two stocks, see our REIT ETF holdings page.
What a reader can do with this
- If you rented from Invitation Homes between January 2021 and September 2024, the FTC's eligibility test is the $45 threshold and whether the company already credited or refunded you. People who believe they qualify and received no check can ask the administrator, Rust Consulting (800-804-6915), whose details the FTC publishes on its own site. The FTC says it never requires payment or account information, so a request for either is not from the FTC.
- If you are reading INVH or AMH for a portfolio, the filings give you the comparison points: same-store NOI growth, the 2027 secured maturities at Invitation Homes against AMH's first maturity in 2028, and the pace of buybacks. The next 10-Qs will show whether growth slowed again. This is not a view on either stock.
- If you are a landlord comparing your own costs, the two companies' reported property management expense is on our property management fees page.
This is analysis of public documents, not investment, legal or tax advice.
Update alert · free
An email when the single-family rental REIT stocks numbers change
When a rate, rule or filing behind this page changes: what changed, the one number that matters, and the source to check it yourself.
FAQ
Sources, read and saved on October 13, 2026: FTC refund page “Invitation Homes Settlement” (Internet Archive copy of July 16, 2026, and a live read of the same page on October 13, 2026), FTC press release of March 11, 2026, FTC press release of September 24, 2024, FTC case page for Invitation Homes Inc., FTC v. (matter 202 3170, civil action 1:24-cv-04280-SEG; Internet Archive copy of March 20, 2026), Complaint (Document 1, September 24, 2024) and Stipulated Order (Document 21, entered September 27, 2024) from ftc.gov, FTC letter of December 8, 2025 to rental property managers; Invitation Homes Inc. Form 10-K for 2025 (0001687229-26-000016), Form 10-K for 2024 (0001687229-25-000008), Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2024 (0001687229-24-000074), Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2026 (0001687229-26-000045), Form 8-K filed July 6, 2026 (0001193125-26-296211) and DEF 14A filed March 26, 2026 (0001193125-26-126310); American Homes 4 Rent Form 10-K for 2025 (0001562401-26-000010), Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2026 (0001562401-26-000047) and DEF 14A filed March 27, 2026 (0001562401-26-000018). Sums, differences and growth rates marked as ours are our arithmetic. This is analysis of public documents, not investment, legal or tax advice.
Keep reading.
- 0126 min read
1033 Exchange for Rental Property: Fire, Condemnation, Deadlines
Section 1033 for a landlord, read from the statute, the regulations and IRS Publications 544 and 547: a rental destroyed by fire or storm gets a 2-year replacement clock and a narrow test; a condemned one gets 3 years and a like-kind test; 4 years is only for a principal residence. With basis arithmetic, the election and the 2026 disaster notices.
- 0223 min read
506b vs 506c: 30% of Real Estate Form Ds Now Choose 506(c)
How filers actually choose between Rule 506(b) and 506(c), counted from the SEC's Form D data: 35,494 real estate notices from January 2019 to September 2026, with the 506(c) share rising from 16.7% to 30.2% in 2025 (10.3% across all industries). Plus what each choice does to offering size, minimum, unsold offerings and non-accredited buyers, the verbatim rule text and the staff's March 12, 2025 letter on verification.
- 0330 min read
Assumable Mortgages for Investors: FHA, VA and Conventional Rules
Which mortgages a buyer can assume, and whether an investor who will not live there can, read from HUD, VA, USDA, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac texts on October 13, 2026: FHA loans closed after December 15, 1989 need an occupant, VA assumptions need no veteran and no occupancy (0.5% funding fee, 45-day decision), conventional loans carry due-on-sale, and the gap is $100,000 on a $400,000 house.